[ad_1]
PR TASIKMALAYA – Ferdinand Hutahaean, known for his active participation in the transmission of various harsh criticisms and innuendo through his Twitter account, is currently known to have been sued by the second son of Jusuf Kalla and 29 lawyers due to defamation charges.
Ferdinand Hutahaean, previously known, admitted that he was confused by the report because he suspected that there were parties who were not accused but who felt accused.
In response to this, constitutional law expert Refly Harun is known to have discussed this through a video uploaded to his YouTub account on Friday, December 4, 2020.
Also read: Denies BSM’s link in lobster seed export, Prabowo’s brother: The period of smearing surnames for money
In the video, Refly Harun explains that someone who writes their views or opinions on social media must be able to distinguish between criticism and accusations.
“We have to differentiate, criticize by spreading rumors or making accusations,” he said.
Furthermore, Refly Harun also said that Ferdinand Hutahaean’s tweet was actually referring to a party displaying three characteristics, as expressed by Ferdinand Hutahaean on his Twitter.
“If we read the teaser, even the little ones know that the goal is three parties,” Refly Harun said, as quoted. PikiranRakyat-Tasikmalaya.com from YouTube Refly Harun, Friday, December 4, 2020.
Furthermore, Refly Harun also revealed that although Ferdinand Hutahaean argued that the word ‘Chaplin’ he wrote was not Jusuf Kalla, everyone already understands that based on this tweet, Ferdinand had directed the satire at the figure of Jusuf Kalla.
[ad_2]
