[ad_1]
Esports athlete Winda Lunardi responded to irregularities expressed by Maybank regarding interest payments from other banks and the flow of funds to Prudential. Winda admitted that she did not go through with the transaction at all.
He also said that the transaction was made without his knowledge and consent.
“By no means, as I said from the beginning, that future savings should not be confused with the term rich,” he said at a press conference at a hotel in the South Jakarta area on Monday (September 11, 2020).
“And as I said from the beginning, all the funds that came in when there was a transaction or activity that occurred in that account, it was without my consent, so there was absolutely no authorization from me to carry out these transactions, including those from Prudential. , “He explained.
According to Winda, Maybank opened a savings account without a passbook or ATM, but only a checking account report.
“At the time we also believed that the checking account sent from Maybank was genuine, but what we have received so far turned out to be a fake. So logically all kinds of transactions that have occurred in that, we never know because we have only received checking accounts. what we consider genuine, “he explained.
On the same occasion, Winda’s attorney, Joey Pattinasarany, said his client was unaware of the activities of the Maybank individuals.
“Basically, we don’t really know about this person’s activity, this person has personal data not only from Winda, but also from her father, but also from her mother. So there are 3 accounts that she can use and control. So we also felt the oddity at the beginning. That’s why we asked Maybank but the answer was resolved. Finally, as there was no communication, we made a complaint to the Police Headquarters, “he explained.
So how did Prudential come to be in the vortex of the 22 billion rupee disappearance case at Maybank? Hurry up, click on the next page.
