[ad_1]
Denpasar –
The President of the Indonesian Medical Association (IDI) for the Bali region, Putra Suteja, was questioned as a witness in the continuing trial of the defendant I Gede Ari Astina, alias Jerinx SID, in the case of “WHO lackeys IDI “. Putra Suteja admitted that he only kept the spirit of IDI.
Putra Suteja relayed this after a face-to-face hearing at Denpasar District Court on Tuesday (10/13/2020). During the trial, he admitted to presenting his report to the police.
“Yes, I relayed what happened. I just keep the spirit of the IDI organizing profession, don’t let people weaken the medical profession in a situation like this,” Suteja told reporters.
Suteja believes that Jerinx is a good person. However, what worries him are the words that are seen to weaken the medical profession in the provision of services.
“He is a good person, everyone is good, but his sentences are not good and it weakens our position in the doctors,” Suteja said.
According to Suteja, the Jerinx SID post about the ‘WHO Kacung IDI’ caused the morale of the doctors to drop. He also felt that the post could make people distrust doctors.
“Being able to report like this, that’s what I say. The second is why can you report? Why is there no mediation? Why not have a discussion? Why is our handling of this COVID problem, while Do the posts ever diminish our enthusiasm for accusing this? ” That is despite the fact that behind me, my younger brothers, the doctors have worked as hard as they could with those words that weaken us and become people who do not believe in what we are doing in the field, right? ”Suteja said.
He admitted that he explained about his report at the trial. And also related to legal personality. “Yes, going around there reports going around how is the management of COVID there. Yes, they were asked about the old legal situation,” Suteja said.
Suteja claimed to have received information about Jerinx SID’s posts from the whatsaap group. “I received information that starting on December 13 in the WA group we have a meeting since the 14th, we have a meeting on the 15th, I have a mandate meeting after 16:00, report,” Suteja continued.
Suteja regretted Jerinx’s sentence, which was allegedly detrimental to the medical profession at IDI.
“I admit that he is a good person but his phrases are narrative, our friends in the field have reduced the quality of his work, how can this be? Our situation is to carry out activities for the management of COVID, there are people who make publications to the detriment of weakening. our spirit, “Suteja said.
Today is the first time that the Jerinx trial has been conducted face to face. The number of participants in the courtroom is limited.
In this case, Jerinx is accused of violating Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law with alternative allegations of Article 27 paragraph (3). After the trial, the team of legal advisers claimed that the two articles had different principles.
In this matter, the JPU claims Jerinx Article 28 paragraph 2 on the whole Article 45 paragraph 2 of Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions on the whole Article 64 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code.
JPU also offers alternate or secondary charges. Jerinx’s actions as regulated and threatened with criminality in article 27, paragraph (3) together with Article 45 subsection (3) of Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE) on the whole Article 64 paragraph (1) of the Penal Code.
Watch the video ‘Jerinx is ready to delete your account for suspension of detention’:
(idh / idh)
