2 Differences between the police and Komnas HAM reconstruction in the FPI Laskar shootings



[ad_1]

Jakarta

Komnas HAM revealed two differences in the investigation carried out by his party with the reconstruction of the case of six-laskar shooting of the FPI held by the police. One of the differences is the number of points plotted.

“What is the difference? There are two. A difference in the distribution of the area around the police resting area, TKP 1, 2, 3, 4. Almost all of them are average, as you see, we are broader, “said Komnas HAM Commissioner Choirul Anam at Komnas HAM office, Jalan Latuharhary, Central Jakarta, on Tuesday (15 / 12/2020).

As is known, the police carried out reconstruction at 4 points in Karawang, West Java. These four points are located at LSI Karawang, Badami Bridge, Km 50 rest area and Km 51 + 200.

However, Anam claims that Komnas HAM tracks more points than the police. In addition to the TKP visited during the reconstruction, Komnas HAM also examined other locations in the Karawang area, West Java.

“Then Komnas HAM from there develops from there everywhere to Karawang. It also gets a lot of things because not all give focus there, “he explained.

The difference in the number of points, Anam continued, affected the witnesses who were questioned in the field. On the other hand, Anam regards this difference in testimony as natural when considering the time factor for taking the testimony of witnesses.

“The two differences in the questions could be different points because the witnesses got different information. Because, for example, if ngomong rest area 50, Komnas HAM can move on before the chaos of all kinds of Komnas HAM can go first. That is why the information is open to many parties. Finally direct close up People are more careful when giving information, in the end all parties find it difficult. Well, Komnas HAM got it first, “he explained.

Through these searches in various places, Komnas HAM finally found evidence that it said could shed light on the disclosure of this case. Later, the hard evidence in question was projectiles.

“We made sure that with certain methods we have a long way to go through testing. At that time, Komnas HAM found several things that could be seen withheld that could be taken to the office. And we rarely find that,” he said.

[ad_2]