India reacted on Tuesday strongly to the concern of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, over the restrictions on NGOs and the arrest of activists, saying that violations of the law cannot be tolerated under the pretext of human rights and that a more informed view of the matter from the UN was expected. Body.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Anurag Srivastava also stated that India was a democratic system of government based on the rule of law and an independent judiciary.
“We have seen some comments from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on an issue related to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA). India is a democratic system of government based on the rule of law and an independent judiciary.
“Law-making is obviously a sovereign prerogative. However, violations of the law cannot be tolerated on the pretext of human rights. A more informed view of the matter was expected from a UN body, ”said Srivastava.
Previously, Bachelet expressed concern about restrictions on foreign funding for NGOs and the arrest of activists in the country.
He called on the government of India to “safeguard the rights of human rights defenders and NGOs, and their ability to carry out their fundamental work” on behalf of the many groups they represent.
“India has long had a strong civil society, which has been at the forefront of innovative human rights advocacy within the country and globally,” he said in a statement.
“But I am concerned that more and more loosely defined laws are being used to suppress these voices,” he said.
Bachelet specifically cited as “concerning” the use of the FCRA, which prohibits the receipt of foreign funds “for any activity detrimental to the public interest.”
Read also | Center plans to crack down on NGOs for violation of regulations
In accordance with the amended FCRA, the provision of Aadhaar numbers by NGO officials has become mandatory for registration. The law also provides for the reduction of administrative expenses of any NGO that receives foreign funding, from 50% to 20% of the annual funds to guarantee spending on its main objectives.
The government has maintained that the legislation was not against any NGO and was an effort to maintain transparency.
.
