A Mohammed siraj The delivery cut Warner abruptly and went to the wicketkeeper Villiers AB. On the way, the ball seemed to have touched something, whether it was the glove or the pants. But it was not clear.
LOOK – VK gets the right DRS Big window in play, close to call, @imVkohli opts for DRS at the last minute and … https://t.co/EBvdqNtuyW
– IndianPremierLeague (@IPL) 1604682019000
While the court referee S Ravi did not give it, the third referee Virender sharma gave it after watching multiple reruns. The umpiring rules suggest that the benefit of the doubt should be given to the batter.
Commentator Pommie mbangwa He immediately criticized the decision saying it shouldn’t have come out.
“Since the evidence was not conclusive and the decision in the field was not published, it should not have been disclosed,” Mbangwa said on air.
However, shortly thereafter, he said that it was a decision that could have gone either way depending on what people think.
Former New Zealand cricketer Scott styris He was more scathing when he said: “Incredible third referee decision. David Warner has every reason to explode. The original decision has not been issued and there is never conclusive evidence to overturn,” Styris tweeted.
Incredible decision by the third referee. David Warner has every reason to explode. Original decision no and never … https://t.co/dXeTijARqW
– Scott Styris (@scottbstyris) 1604680081000
However, former India captain Sunil Gavaskar, who was commenting with Mbangwa, ended the controversy on television by saying that the referee’s decision must be respected.
Surprisingly, there was no dissection of the layoff after that, as with other layoffs.
.
