[ad_1]
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday sought to know from the Center whether it had plans to transport trapped migrant workers to their home states, but admonished activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan for repeatedly tweeting about the public’s loss of faith in court, telling him: “If you had no faith in the institution, you should not appear before us.”
The warning came from a bank of judges NV Ramana, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and BR Gavai when Bhushan appeared for PIL petitioner Jagdeep Chhonkar seeking an address to the Center and state governments to provide buses to transport trapped migrant workers. to their homes. Bhushan said that when state governments were organizing buses to bring back trapped students in Kota, why couldn’t they do the same for migrant workers?
When the bank noted that it was an issue that required coordinated action between the Center and the states, Attorney General Tushar Mehta said the Center is already in talks with the states to find a way out for migrant workers trapped in various places from the March 25, when The Running of the Bulls began. He also said that the basic needs of migrant workers are being met by governments.
Bhushan cited a study and said 96% of migrant workers did not receive a ration from the government, 90% did not receive wages, and most are in dire shape, and yet the higher court believed the government. When making statements indicating that the court was following the government line leading to the loss of public faith in the institution, the bank replied: “We never accepted anything that the government blindly said. We have always sought the government’s response on matters important humanitarian “. carefully scrutinizing the affidavits, we approved the corresponding orders. ”
Judge Kaul reminded Bhushan of his recent tweets about SC and said, “If you do not have faith in the institution, you should not appear before us.” The bank said: “Such comments harmed the institution. We are not in favor of the government or against anyone. We examine the issues on merit and approve appropriate orders in the given situation.” SG said the study cited by Bhushan was clearly wrong and told the bank that whenever he loses a case, he routinely runs to television cameras to declare it is a black day for the judiciary.
Bhushan said he never said he had no faith in the institution. Referring to his tweets and comments during the arguments, the bank said it was hurting the institution. He then asked the SG to receive instructions from the government within a week on Chhonkar’s request to seek an address from governments to provide buses to transport these workers to their homes.
Chhonkar said that according to the 2011 census there were more than four crore migrant workers, but after the sudden blockade to control the speed of Covid-19 disease, governments have provided shelter and food to only a fraction of them. “A large number of migrant workers, stranded across the country due to lack of transportation services, want to return to their hometowns to be with their families. Keeping them forcibly in their workplace is inhumane and violates their fundamental right to free movement, “he said.
[ad_2]
The warning came from a bank of judges NV Ramana, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and BR Gavai when Bhushan appeared for PIL petitioner Jagdeep Chhonkar seeking an address to the Center and state governments to provide buses to transport trapped migrant workers. to their homes. Bhushan said that when state governments were organizing buses to bring back trapped students in Kota, why couldn’t they do the same for migrant workers?
When the bank noted that it was an issue that required coordinated action between the Center and the states, Attorney General Tushar Mehta said the Center is already in talks with the states to find a way out for migrant workers trapped in various places from the March 25, when The Running of the Bulls began. He also said that the basic needs of migrant workers are being met by governments.
Bhushan cited a study and said 96% of migrant workers did not receive a ration from the government, 90% did not receive wages, and most are in dire shape, and yet the higher court believed the government. When making statements indicating that the court was following the government line leading to the loss of public faith in the institution, the bank replied: “We never accepted anything that the government blindly said. We have always sought the government’s response on matters important humanitarian “. carefully scrutinizing the affidavits, we approved the corresponding orders. ”
Judge Kaul reminded Bhushan of his recent tweets about SC and said, “If you do not have faith in the institution, you should not appear before us.” The bank said: “Such comments harmed the institution. We are not in favor of the government or against anyone. We examine the issues on merit and approve appropriate orders in the given situation.” SG said the study cited by Bhushan was clearly wrong and told the bank that whenever he loses a case, he routinely runs to television cameras to declare it is a black day for the judiciary.
Bhushan said he never said he had no faith in the institution. Referring to his tweets and comments during the arguments, the bank said it was hurting the institution. He then asked the SG to receive instructions from the government within a week on Chhonkar’s request to seek an address from governments to provide buses to transport these workers to their homes.
Chhonkar said that according to the 2011 census there were more than four crore migrant workers, but after the sudden blockade to control the speed of Covid-19 disease, governments have provided shelter and food to only a fraction of them. “A large number of migrant workers, stranded across the country due to lack of transportation services, want to return to their hometowns to be with their families. Keeping them forcibly in their workplace is inhumane and violates their fundamental right to free movement, “he said.
