NEW DELHI: By launching physical distribution of ‘Svamitva’ property cards, PM Modi struck on Sunday opposition for his criticism of farm laws and other issues, saying he was doing it out of opposition and using “foul language”, perhaps a reference to recent congressional statements by Rahul Gandhi calling the prime minister a “coward.”
He said the opposition was against development and that the reforms had baffled those who had benefited from the middleman system. The leadership had an interesting backdrop of socialist icon Jaiprakash Narayan and unconditional sangh Nanaji Deshmukh seen side by side. The prime minister recalled both leaders and said JP’s vision was central to Deshmukh’s rural empowerment campaign. “The country has begun to recognize the people involved in the looting of the country. These people are blindly opposed to everything. They are not concerned with the poor, the people or the country. These people want to stop development, ”he said.
Modi’s gesture highlighting the legacy of JP, who hailed from Bihar, could be seen in the context of the upcoming assembly elections in the state. the Swamitva The program will allow owners of a lakh property to download their property cards via an SMS link delivered to their mobile phones. This would be followed by the physical distribution of property cards by the respective state governments. Before the launch of the plan, Modi tweeted: “I bow to Loknayak JP in his jayanti. He fought valiantly for the freedom of India and when our democratic spirit was attacked, he led a strong mass movement to protect it. For him, there was nothing above the national interest and the welfare of the people ”. He added that Deshmukh was one of JP’s most devoted followers.
Dedicating the launch of the scheme to the two leaders, Modi said that the gigantic scheme was being launched on a day that was the anniversary of the birth of both to whom it was conferred. Bharat ratna. Stepping up the attack on opposition parties, the prime minister said: “Keeping people from the villages and the poor deprived of facilities has been the basis of some people’s politics. These days, these people are also having a problem with the historic reforms that have been made in the agricultural sector.
.
