Moderna Says Its Covid-19 Vaccine Is Over 94% Efficient, To Apply To European And US Regulators For Emergency Use


Moderna Inc. said it would ask US and European regulators on Monday to allow emergency use of its COVID-19 the vaccine, as the results of a new study confirm that vaccines offer strong protection accelerating the race to start limited vaccines as they coronavirus the ruckus gets worse.

Several candidate vaccines must be successful for the world to eliminate the pandemic, which has been on the rise in the US and Europe. US hospitals have been stretched to the limit, as the nation has seen more than 160,000 new cases a day and more than 1,400 deaths daily. Since it first appeared nearly a year ago in China, the virus has killed more than 1.4 million people worldwide.

Moderna is behind Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech in seeking to start vaccinations in the US in December. Across the Atlantic, British regulators are also evaluating the injection from Pfizer and another from AstraZeneca.

Moderna created her vaccines with the US National Institutes of Health and already had a hint that they were working, but she said she got the final necessary results over the weekend that suggest the vaccine is more than 94% effective.

From 196 COVID-19 So far in their huge US study, 185 were trial participants who received the placebo and 11 who received the actual vaccine. The only people to become seriously ill, 30 participants, including one who died, had received bogus injections, said Dr. Tal Zaks, the company’s chief medical officer in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

When he heard about the results, I allowed myself to cry for the first time, Zaks told The Associated Press. Already, only in the trial, we have already saved lives. Imagine that the impact then multiplies in the people who can receive this vaccine.

Moderna said the vaccines’ effectiveness and a good safety record so far with temporary, flu-like side effects mean they meet the requirements set forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. emergency before the final stage test is completed. The European Medicines Agency, the European version of the FDA, has noted that it is also open to faster emergency authorization.

WHAT COMES NEXT

The FDA is committed that before deciding to implement any COVID-19 vaccines, their scientific advisers will publicly debate whether there is enough evidence behind each candidate.

First, on December 10, Pfizer and BioNTech will present data suggesting that their vaccine candidate is 95% effective. Moderna said her turn is expected in this scientific tribunal exactly one week later, on December 17.

RATING OF INITIAL DOSES

If the FDA allows emergency use, Moderna hopes to have 20 million doses ready for the US by the end of the year. Recipients will need two doses, making it enough for 10 million people.

Pfizer expects to have 50 million doses globally in December. Half of them or enough for 12.5 million people are destined for the United States.

This week, a different panel of American experts, established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, will meet to decide how the initial supplies will be distributed. They are expected to reserve the meager first doses for healthcare workers and, if the vaccines work well enough in the frail elderly, for residents of long-term care facilities. As more vaccines become available in the coming months, other essential workers and people at increased risk of coronavirus it would go online. But not enough is expected for the general population until at least the spring.

Outside of the US, Zaks said that Moderna’s important supplies will be available later, in the first quarter of next year.

Obviously, we are doing everything in our power to increase capacity and speed up deadlines, he said.

Both Moderna and Pfizer’s vaccines are made using the same technology, using a piece of genetic code for the spike protein that is inserted into the virus. That messenger RNA, or mRNA, signals the body to produce a harmless spike protein, training immune cells to recognize it if the real virus eventually appears.

ASTRAZENIC CONFUSION

AstraZeneca announced last week the confusing initial results of its candidate vaccine from research in Britain and Brazil.

That vaccine appears to be 62% effective when tested as originally intended, with recipients receiving two full doses. But due to a manufacturing error, a small number of volunteers received a lower first dose, and AstraZeneca said that in that group, the vaccine appeared to be 90% effective.

Experts say it’s unclear why the lower-dose approach would work better and that it may just be a statistical oddity.

A larger study is still underway in the US on the AstraZeneca candidate that should eventually give the FDA a better idea of ​​how well it works. The FDA has said that any COVID-19 the vaccine should be at least 50% effective.

In the meantime, the UK government will have to decide whether its UK data is sufficient for early deployment there.

STILL IN THE TUBE

Johnson & Johnson is also in the final stages of testing in the US and several other countries to see if its vaccine candidate could work with a single dose.

Both the J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines work by using harmless cold viruses to carry the spike protein gene into the body and prime the immune system.

Different technologies have ramifications for the ease with which different vaccines can be distributed globally. AstraZeneca injections will not require freezer storage like Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Candidates made with other technologies are also in an advanced stage of testing. Another US company, Novavax Inc., announced on Monday that it finished enrolling 15,000 people in an advanced-stage study in Britain and plans to start recruiting even more volunteers for final tests in the United States and Mexico in the coming weeks.

Vaccines made by three Chinese companies and a Russian candidate are also being tested in thousands of people in countries around the world.

____

The Associated Press Department of Health and Science receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes Department of Science Education. AP is solely responsible for all content.

.