New Delhi: For a month, the farmers’ agitation still remains in its hard-line position against the new agricultural laws, but the central government is ready to hold the next round of talks on all relevant issues to find a “logical solution” with an “open mind”. to end this prolonged stalemate.
Ahead of the crucial sixth round of talks after a three-week hiatus, Union Ministers Narendra Singh Tomar and Piyush Goyal met with Union Interior Minister Amit Shah to finalize the government’s position, but it seems there are some forces in our country that don’t want this. move to finish. There are indications that agitating farmers are under the influence of such forces.
These forces include the Khalistani, the ‘Tukde Tukde’ gang, the urban naxals, and the left-wing parties, which in fact largely control the ideological edifice of these forces. In particular, India’s anti-left forces that supported China in the 1962 war still do not want to witness India taking advantage of China, especially as the world community is slowly emerging from the coronavirus pandemic.
When the whole world looks to India as an alternative to China in the wake of the COVID-19 situation that exposed the communist nation for supposedly hiding information about this deadly virus, but some leftist forces in India are not able to digest this reality and they want to scuttle the overall economic development of India.
You may remember the protests against the new citizenship law, in which people of a particular religion were misled to take advantage of the situation and scare them that they would lose their citizenship. Now, under the shadow of this farmers movement, also the people of a particular community in a particular region are being intimidated that they would lose their land. Anti-national forces have been using a similar formula since the country’s independence, thus helping China indirectly.
To understand this fact, you need to pay attention to some alarming economic facts that have directly affected India’s economic interests. So far, Punjab alone has lost 30 billion rupees due to the movement of farmers. The move is causing losses in states such as Punjab, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh by an average of 3.5 billion rupees a day, according to one estimate. In 34 days, these states have lost more than 1.19 billion rupees.
In Punjab, the telecommunications towers of many companies are suffering damage. So far, protesting farmers have cut power to some 1,500 towers in addition to damaging them.
The turmoil has also affected the production of motor vehicles in India. China is currently number one in the world, while India ranks fourth. Most of the major auto companies now want to move their manufacturing units from China to India, but this move is creating a bad image of the country.
In terms of mobile phone manufacturing, India ranks second in the world after China, but this ongoing protest may hamper that progress. The country’s small and large traders have so far lost Rs.5 billion due to this move.
When these movements take place in a country, they also affect the international image of that country and large companies avoid investing there. It is obvious that if India’s image suffers, China will be the biggest beneficiary. Left-wing forces, who still regard China as their ideological ancestor, are reportedly working on the same formula they adopted during the 1962 India-China war. After facing off with Indian forces in Ladakh and Doklam, China is now trying new ways to weaken India. without directly confronting.
The latest border dispute with China in Ladakh has yet to be resolved as the armies of both countries are camped along the Royal Line of Control (LAC) despite the bitter cold. In such a situation, logistical support to the Indian soldiers stationed in Ladakh must be uninterrupted, but attempts were made to sink this supply line passing through Punjab. In the name of farmers’ agitation, all routes have been closed and even trains are not allowed.
In a letter to farmers a few days ago, Agriculture Minister Narendra Singh Tomar had mentioned this fact. People here must think that if soldiers stationed at the border will not have access to food and clothing, who will benefit the most?
If you look closely at the ongoing farmer movement, you will understand that this is not a sudden consequence of the new farm laws or dissatisfaction with the government, but a well thought out plan.
.
