[ad_1]
The refrain of transparency and research on the outbreak of coronavirus disease is increasing more within the race as much as the truncated session of the World Health Assembly 10 days later.
The disease, which originated in China late last year, has killed more than 1/4 of a million people worldwide in just over 4 months. Many international venues blame China for failing to warn the world of the disease that could have minimized its development. In addition, questions have been asked from the World Health Organization, accused of being too respectful of China.
The strongest criticism of China and WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus came from the President of the United States, Donald Trump, and from Secretary of State Michael Pompeo. Last month, USA USA He suspended funding to WHO to further the purpose.
But the United States is not the one that is upset about China and the WHO’s role.
For the past week and more, the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, has also lent her support to the group that requires an investigation into the origin of the Covid outbreak.
Also read: China must be clarified in Covid-19 | Opinion
This week, the European Union declared that it could transfer a decision on the World Health Assembly for a timely assessment of the global response to the coronavirus pandemic along with the efficiency of the World Health Organization.
Diplomats in Washington and Geneva advise that the decision, which was being drafted in session with numerous international venues, introduced enormous control for China within the race as much as the annual assembly of the global wellness physicist.
Beijing has lagged behind its initial handling of the virus, which has pushed the global economic system into recession because it spreads across the globe. Cases have been reported in more than 210 international locations and territories since they were first recognized in China in December 2019.
British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace also questioned China’s role within the Covid-19 outbreak, stating that China must be open and clear about what it learned, its shortcomings and successes.
Ben Wallace’s comments are seen in the context of the statement by British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab in April, which underlined the need to ask “difficult questions” about how the coronavirus occurred and how it could have been stopped.
Swedish Health Minister Lena Hallengren made clear last month that her authorities wanted an investigation into the origin of the virus, in addition to an investigation into WHO’s role in the pandemic.
In this context, diplomats in Washington mentioned that China seemed to have begun to approach governments in international locations for help in the face of public criticism. This technique was discovered in Germany, where Chinese diplomats approached officials of the German authorities to ask them to make “positive public statements” about China’s treatment of the disease. Officials in Berlin had rejected the request.
Beijing has needed to combat accusations that it had tried to hide the outbreak of the disease and had alerted the world to the disease too late. At times, they are wondering why Chinese authorities halted flights from Wuhan to the rest of the nation after the Covid-19 outbreak, but allowed flights worldwide. Or why he restricted the analysis carried out by Chinese scientists on the origins of the virus.
The authorities had reprimanded the doctors along with Li Wenliang, who later turned him in, for sharing warnings about the coronavirus, an infection hazard on WeChat teams in late December.
Criticism of this method of censoring the data flared up again on Friday after a line referring to coronavirus disease that was detected in China and spread to the world was a far cry from an article written for a Chinese day by 27 European ambassadors to commemorate the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the EU and China.
But there have been a series of cases of Chinese diplomats published around the world launching assaults on the media for what they describe as efforts to politicize the Covid-19 outbreak.
