Arnab Goswami is interrogated while the CJM allows the police to interrogate him for 3 hours a day | India News

MUMBAI: On Friday, Alibaug’s chief judicial magistrate granted permission to police Question Arnab goswami and the other two defendants in judicial custody for three hours a day, it emerged on Monday. When Goswami was sent to judicial custody last Wednesday, the police had asked the magistrate for permission to question him and the other two defendants in the case of incitement to the suicide of Anvay Naik, saying that without police custody, their investigation will be he had detained because his request for review against the granting of judicial custody before the court of sessions was pending.
The court granted permission to question the three, as otherwise, according to law, the police do not have access to a defendant who is in jail without a court order. A 10-member squad of Raigad police questioned Goswami and two other people who are now being held in Taloja jail for three hours on Monday. Inspector Jamil Shaikh from the Raigad criminal branch, who is the investigating officer, he said. The officer said three teams questioned Goswami, Firoz Shaikh and Neetish Sarda in the afternoon.
Goswami, Firoze Shaikh and Sarda were transferred to Taloja Central Prison on Sunday after Raigad police claimed that Goswami was active on social media by phone while in judicial custody at the provisional quarantine center of the Civic School of Alibaug.

At the hearing on the police review request before court sessions challenging the rejection of a 14-day police custody declaration, defense attorney Vijay Aggarwal de Sarda argued at length on Monday. Their argument was about maintaining the request for review, which also sought orders to prohibit the magistrate from hearing and issuing bail orders in the matter. Aggarwal cited three judgments of the SC to affirm that the preventive detention order was an interlocutory order and, therefore, no reason for review could be admitted. The special prosecutor Pradeep Gharat, in turn, cited a ruling from the HC of Gujarat, which had explained what the CV meant, to argue that it was a final preventive detention order and, therefore, the allegation of review should be heard based on the background.
Goswami’s attorney, Aabad Ponda, argued that both requests for review and bond requests are heard simultaneously. The session court will first issue orders on the preliminary maintainability issue raised by Aggarwal in the review statement on Tuesday. Bail requests will also be addressed on Tuesday.
Inspector Shaikh said: “Interrogating the defendant Arnab Goswami housed in Taloja jail will be a very time consuming matter as we will have to commute for two hours daily from Alibaug to get to Taloja jail and we will have restrictions on questioning him for only three hours. hours according to the CJM order. Police custody would be convenient to carry out the interrogation ”.