The panel of physicians from the Indian Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), who were to re-evaluate Sushant Singh Rajput’s post-mortem and viscera reports based on the 20% viscera sample available with them, presented their findings to the Central Board of Investigation (CBI) on Monday, September 28.
The AIIMS panel, led by Dr. Sudhir Gupta, was formed at the request of the CBI in August to study Sushant’s autopsy and viscera reports. The findings made by the team have yet to be made public.
“There are no traces of organic poison,” says an unofficial report:
AIIMS forensic report has found no traces of organic poison on Sushant Singh Rajput’s body, according to news reports on Times now Y India today. This finding has not yet been made official by the panel or the CBI and has only been reported by the news channels attributing it to “sources”.
What’s official so far about the AIIMS findings:
The only statement from Dr. Sudhir Gupta on this is that “AIIMS and CBI agree on the death case of Sushant Singh Rajput, but more deliberations are needed. It is necessary to examine some legal aspects to obtain a logical legal conclusion ”.
200% wrong claim from SSR Family Lawyer:
On 25 September, Sushant Singh Rajput’s family lawyer, Vikas Singh Singh, stated that according to AIIMS doctors’ findings, Sushant’s cause of death was “200% strangulation and not suicide”. According to a report, Singh claimed that a doctor who is part of the AIIMS team had long ago told him that the photos sent by Singh indicate 200% death by strangulation and not suicide. However, Dr. Sudhir Gupta has called Singh’s claims “incorrect.”
Dr. Sudhir Gupta in an interview with India today reacted to defend Vikas Singh’s claims, saying: “The investigation is still continuing. What you are saying is not correct. We cannot just conclude on a murder or suicide based only on the ligature marks and the crime scene. We need more investigation , which is still ongoing and has not been completed. “
.
