on Wednesday he told the government that he intends to establish a committee made up of representatives of
across India, the government and other stakeholders to solve this problem and post the matter for tomorrow.
Here’s a look at what the Supreme Court said
A bench of Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian were listening to a series of petitions asking for instructions from the authorities to immediately expel farmers protesting at various border points in Delhi against three new agricultural laws. The petitioner cited the Supreme Court’s Shaheen Bagh ruling, which prohibited the blocking of roads in protests.
The court told Attorney General Tushar Mehta that it intends to establish a committee made up of representatives of Indian farmers’ unions, the government and other stakeholders to solve this problem.
The court noted that “because this will soon become a national problem and with the government, it appears that it will not work.”
“His negotiations with the protesting farmers had apparently not worked so far,” the Supreme Court told the Center.
The SC granted permission to implement farmer organizations.
The CV said urgent resolution measures are required through negotiations as farmers on the Delhi border do not appear to be in the mood to speak.
When the Delhi government, through attorney Rahul Mehra, spoke in favor of repealing the agricultural laws, Attorney General Tushar Mehta said that the Delhi government had no role in the matter at hand, to which he agreed agreed the superior court.
The attorney general said that the Center will not do anything that harms the interests of farmers and is willing to negotiate.
.
