NEW DELHI: After former US president referred to Rahul Gandhi as a ‘nervous’ leader Barack Obama in his book, the Congress He chose not to comment officially, although party leaders criticized Obama on Friday.
Congressional Chief Spokesman Randeep Surjewala said: “Let me humbly remind some overzealous friends of the media running a sponsored agenda that we do not comment on individual views in a book.”
“In the past, a leader has been called a ‘psychopath’ and a ‘master divisor’ by people and agencies. We did not acknowledge such comments!” added.
Although the leaders of the Congress have opposed it. “Mr. Obama, no one can know the personality of a person in 5 to 10 minutes. Sometimes it takes years. You are wrong to judge the personality of Rahul Gandhi ji. You will bite the dust, just wait a while,” Udit said. Raj, party spokesman.
Congressional Leader Archana Dalmia said in a tweet: “We don’t need a Barack Obama to pass judgment on ‘Our Leader’ Rahul Gandhi.”
While Acharya Pramod Krishnan He has been more critical of Obama, he said, “He has hurt the feelings of millions of congressional workers who regard Rahul Gandhi as God.”
He attacked Obama and said: “Those who tell the truth are incompetent and those who tell lies are competent” and how Obama knew that he is a bad student, if he was with him in class. Krishnan called Obama an “andh bhakt.”
Rahul Gandhi had met Obama on many occasions, the first was in November 2010 when Rahul Gandhi was the party’s general secretary. And the second was when Obama visited India in 2017, the sources said.
Former US President Barack Obama’s new book, ‘A Promised Land’, throws a strong left hook on Rahul Gandhi’s “nervous and uninformed quality” while delivering a warm and not-so-political eulogy to Rahul’s mother, Sonia Gandhi, according to a review of the book Thursday in the New York Times.
The first spate of book excerpts circulating on the Internet point to a brutal downing of Rahul Gandhi. “Rahul Gandhi has a nervous and reportless quality about him, as if he were a student who had done coursework and was eager to impress the teacher, but deep down lacked the aptitude or passion to master the subject,” he notes. the revision. .
.
