Real objectives of Nepal PM Oli new political map are in Kathmandu, nepal – india news



[ad_1]

Nepal prime minister KP Sharma Oli to push to expedite the release of a new political map on Wednesday is linked to its huge climbdown last month, when he had to cancel an ordinance within five days, the people familiar with the development said.

There is a concerted effort on the part of the Oli’s government in recent days to play the anti-India card to fan the ultra-nationalist emotions to settle domestic scores, sources told Hindustan Times.

“Through the generation of an ultra-nationalist feeling, Oli, has left his fellow former PMs Pushpa Kamal Dahal “Prachanda” and Madhav Kumar Nepal – with no option but to side with him and to make India the victim in the crossfire between the two groups, a second person, a Kathmandu observer, said.

In Nepal, the new political map that claimed the Lipulekh Pass, Limpiyadhura and Kalapani in Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh as their own is only a part of this exercise. PM Oli’s statement in the parliament on Tuesday that claimed the infection by the coronavirus from India is “more lethal” than those of China and Italy is another.

The two former prime ministers, who have been accused of destabilising the KP Sharma Oli-led government, is seen to have played a leading role in the tug-of-war that played out in Nepal the politics of power.

At a time in Nepal, like the rest of the world was fighting against Covid-19, the prime minister had surprised his country when it came to double-ordinances notified.

These two made it easier for the parties to divide and register a new faction and were widely perceived as part of an exercise by PM Oli to strengthen himself in the party and the government.

But he had to resign on April 23, of rejection and of the ordinances in the five-day period to buy peace with his first detractors. The energy minister Barsaman pun that he told the Kathmandu Post that the Cabinet approved the ordinance following what he described as “excessive criticism”.

According to the reports of Nepal, the Communist Party of China of the department of international liaison has also stepped up efforts to negotiate peace between the comrades in Nepal.

This was the shadow of domestic power play at work, when the management of the land minister Padma Kumari Aryal on Wednesday, they celebrated a new map of Nepal. According to a report in the Kathmandu Post in your Press conference, that he hopes that India could lead to Nepal’s decision to publish the new map in a “positive way”. She did not elaborate.

The 80 km stretch of the highway from New Delhi, built in Uttarakhand on the Dharchula to Lipulekh to make it easier for pilgrims to reach Kailash Mansarovar in the Tibet Autonomous Region offers the perfect opportunity.

Army chief Gen Manoj Mukund Naravane brushed aside the shrill voices of Kathmandu, stressing that there was no dispute over the land on which the road had been built. Gen Naravane went on to suggest that the protests could be at the behest of “someone”, a veiled reference to China.

The prime Minister of Oli, who was severely tilt towards China, it has been described the Gene Naravane comment as “inappropriate”.

KALAPANI

Kalapani is a 35-sq km area in Uttarakhand’s Pithoragarh district. Nepal claims this area as part of your Darchula district.

The tri-junction point of Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura in Nepal, separates the northwest China and the Tibet Autonomous Region to the north and India Kumaon in the south. The Mahakali river has been considered as a natural line of demarcation to separate the borders.

Indian security officials say that China has tacitly recognized India’s claim over the Kalapani when it was agreed to open a border trade post at Lipulekh in 2015.

India reacts to Nepal map

The ministry of foreign affairs describes the new political map as an “artificial enlargement of the territorial claims,” and asked Kathmandu to refrain from “unjustifiable mapping of the assertion.”

“This unilateral act is not based on historical facts and evidence. It is contrary to the bilateral understanding to solve the boundary issues through diplomatic dialogue,” External Affairs Ministry Spokesperson Anurag Srivastava, said.

.

[ad_2]