I don’t think good company about Gorillaz NFT



The first album of the virtual band Gorillaz is turning 20 years old today (a fact I am trying to forget immediately), and in celebration the group will celebrate the general anniversary: ​​re-release albums, sell new trades and, accordingly, copy N.M.E., Selling NFT.

This is the news Broken Me.

At this stage, it is clear that NFTs are a thorny atmospheric issue – while it can be difficult to calculate how bad they are in terms of carbon emissions, the picture does not look good. In general, given the NFT news, it’s easier for people to think about market share that really hurts the world: “Well, brand, hopefully this marketing stunt was worth setting the earth on fire?” Turns out it’s not fun when you really like someone, especially if the artist created it before Full album about ecological destruction.

I don’t want to come in like I’m trying to cancel gorillas or say it’s bad for artists to make money. Artists should pay a lot more for their work, and I’m all for trying to come up with new things to sell to fans willing to pay money. But the N.F.T. Comes with a cost that is hard to make viable, and I like to overlook most of the bands that have left me sitting Melancholy hill. And I don’t All alone – Many other fans there have expressed their disappointment on Twitter. It probably won’t help that their so-called ecological albums Plastic beach, And they are allegedly working with a company called Superplastic to sell NFT. Life comes to you fast.

If you’re an artist, here’s one Song 2 Repeat: