Worship: Look at these lawyers if you want to understand what absurd age we live in!



[ad_1]

How long can you go crazy? the In defense of Diane (The good fight) They say the limits are quite wide in this regard, and their poetic artistic poetics rhyme wonderfully with the crazy age we live in: In the series’ fourth season, they can still create a situation at any point to brainstorm us.

Harvard graduates, urban liberals, feminists, African-American activists under the presidency of Donald Trump, what if this is not the perfect ingredient for nightmares?

the In defense of Diane it’s actually an accidentally exploding miracle that works very well because a lot of things in the world go wrong. And because he can react intelligently, fun and profoundly to all of this, and his episodes tickle his mind. They not only entertain, but also drag them into intellectual depths.

Louis Canning (Michael J. Fox) and Diane Lockhart (Christine Baranski)

©

the In defense of Diane deservedly popular, worth seven seasons In defense of my husband (The good wife) started, and it’s also interesting to remember during the fourth season of HBO Gón that, as its pilot was done before the 2016 presidential election in the United States, the creators subsequently intervened in the scene starring Diane Lockhart (Christine Baranski) seems annihilated through Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration. Because the writers are also gearing up for a Clinton presidency, they are also toying with the idea in Season 4, but a little later. The series, on the other hand, has continued to draw inspiration from Donald Trump and the world that elevated him to president and formed and transformed himself as president ever since.

the In defense of Diane By the way, it also performs well in the Bechdel test: we found women in the main roles, the protagonist is over sixty years old and most of the characters are black: none of this data would be of great value if we were not used to a completely different world when it comes to movies.

Not to mention that this is the series whose title is already a work of art that perfectly evokes the most important slogans of the show: power and privilege, collapse and chaos.

As for the basics, just a quick summary.

Diane Lockhart, a liberal lawyer whose office gently but inevitably adorns her joint photo with Hillary Clinton, finds herself overnight in a time when traditional cultural and social railings are fading, where turmoil is at stake, where she is already There is not only populism dictating the trend, but also violence. Chicago is experiencing all of this in the Reddick-Boseman bond, one of its founders who joined Martin Luther King at the time, and where he, the great Diane Lockhart, counts in the past, and not incidentally, past and present. . minority certification. “

Diane Lockhart (Christine Baranski) and Adrian Boseman (Delroy Lindo)

©

At first, Diane thinks that if she can rule out mental illness in her own little world, as she plays Trump’s election as president, then insanity won’t win, but then it turns out that more is needed. That he cannot stay in his own little world, in which madness creeps legally. And this madness has already been cleverly captured by the creators. It’s hard to forget, for example, the scene from the first season in which her husband, Kurt McVeigh (Gary Cole), comes to life on the shoulder of a bruise, as if it were just a test of Rorschach, with Donald Trump, with whom Diane mixed passionately.

The Trump era appears in the series through the filter of sarcasm, absurdity and tragedy. the In defense of Diane It has always been launched into political vortices with great force and was inspired by what is currently happening, at the same time that it gives them context or simply rethinks them. Terrorism, fake news, the metoo, police violence, racism, sexism and even the alleged Trump video of Moscow pit sex gloriously engage in television history (with a small major push in front of Quentin Tarantino) were featured in the episodes.

Diane Lockhart’s character is already in the mother series, Protecting my husband He was also so strong in his production that he often stretched the boundaries of his role, but there he still had to let the main character Alicia Florrick (Julianna Margulies) shine. The split, on the other hand, has already given this passionately complex figure all the limelight: Diane Lockhart is intelligent, confident, sarcastic, with tender affection as well as a murderous instinct, and who, to make matters worse, falls in love with a rowdy conservative, who will be a real treasure in the hands of writers.

And then we should definitely talk about Lockhart’s so-called laugh, in which fewer human gestures are able to better understand the essence of a situation.

Queen.

When to believe and when to doubt?

the In defense of Diane In the three seasons so far, the creators haven’t held back either, but for the fourth, they’ve really let go of the reins surprising fans so far, as well as newcomers. Because we may be dealing with a legal series at first glance, but one In defense of Diane It is the product of a true creative revolution that constantly strains the framework of our conceptions of reality and truth.

Lucca Quinn (Cush Jumbo) and David Lee (Zach Grenier)

©

And here we are now forced to move in the direction of spoilers if we want to answer questions about how safe our reality is.

If Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh are like a bad dream, like Diane Lockhart lives, what do they have to do with reality?

In fact, the first episode of the fourth season immediately set out to curve space and time and play on the simultaneously absurd and normal idea of ​​what it would be like if Hillary Clinton, not Donald Trump, had won the United States presidential election four years ago. . This thinking game is annoying from this series only because there was hardly another production in recent years that could have revived the apocalyptic features of the Trump presidency better than the In defense of Diane.

Julius Cain (MIchael Boatman), Adrian Boseman (Delroy Lindo), Diane Lockhart (Christine Baranski) and Liz Reddick (Audra McDonald)

©

So they remember the first scene from the first season of the series, already mentioned here, in which Diane, sitting on the couch, watched Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration, then started splashing champagne in the fourth season, also jumping off a couch. because Hillary Clinton really did it. presidential oath. At this point, it’s obvious to ask the question that Marissa (Sarah Steele), her assistant, also asks if Diane is using magic mushrooms again. By the way, it wouldn’t be surprising based on previous seasons, as the acclaimed and respected Chicago attorney has become a huge admirer of psilocybin, but by the start of the fourth season, the situation had deteriorated to the point that Diane didn’t even know the answer. The ground has slipped under his feet since the Clinton presidency with at least as much force as Trumpe at the time.

One of the guiding principles of the series, which is based on the initial shock of the Trump presidency and then on the defining events, gestures, and subsequent prayers, is the recognition of how quickly satire will become reality today. Diane Lockhart’s perception of reality has leaked here and there in previous seasons, but now surrealism is finally embedded in her life.

From this point of view, a Clinton presidency is already an absurd utopia, and the creators imagine it accordingly: because, on the one hand, Hillary Clinton only had to win a presidential election, and humanity immediately found the antidote to cancer , polar bears escaped and primeval forests flourished. On the other hand, without Trump, the United States also avoided trauma that later became movements in reality.

Because we might not have known who Brett Kavanaugh was under Clinton, but the writers also made sure that Harvey Weinstein, a great friend and generous supporter of Democrats, had not fallen for the crimes he committed, and could have done today. I would also happily give an interview to Matt Lauer or Charlie Rose, who were actually accused of sexual harassment in reality, who would also not have been caught up in the metoo movement, since it would not have existed, it would not have existed:

as if all the change and development had been stifled by the fact that a woman had finally come to the presidency.

Saving more spoilers, the leitmotif of the new season is more or less how the rich and influential interpret their privileges as placing not only people but also above the law, and which has a lot to do with the previously marked mysterious memo 618 , which shines at first that will cause Diane Lockhart a lot of headaches.

Christine Baranski

©

And here creators can further intensify disintegration. At the end of the first season, the law firm’s namesake Adrian Boseman (Delroy Lindo) and Diane are still reflecting on how cruel and strange times are passing: “It seems that something has been unleashed. It is as if one of the parties does not work, “but still, reassuring each other, they agree that the only constant is the law. There may be agitation, God knows what people are doing, but you can hold onto the law.

And that is the railing that disappears for the fourth season. Understandably, the lawyers who based their profession and worldview on the power of the law will be a little confused.

To learn more cultures on our Facebook page, follow us:



[ad_2]