Two of the three prosecutors who went through Simonka’s investigation left voluntarily, and one because Péter Polt would have relocated him.

Ákos Hadházy, an independent member of parliament, published that “two of the three prosecutors who went through the Simonka investigation” left voluntarily “and Polt offered another” important “position to a senior prosecutor, which he refused to accept.”

The deputy writes, he knows, “they would have been placed at a much lower level than their previous rank, so he resigned,” although Polt notes that there is no “demotion” for them, “I would rather end the status.”

György Simonka of Fidesz “boasted in a municipal meeting that all prosecutors involved in the investigation against him were fired,” writes Hadházy, who said that Attorney General Péter Polt “refuted this for the first time, but it seems that if we do He asks the question in a different way, Simonka’s boast is already very worthy ”.

Ákos Hadházy writes that Péter Polt’s written response “raises another very serious question.” It is stated that:

“The dismissed prosecutor participated in said investigation until May 2017, his dismissal occurred more than two years later, on July 31, 2019. The position of prosecutor was ceased due to the reorganization of the organizational system of the prosecution investigation. In accordance with article 35 (4) of the Law, he was offered a transfer to another position, also an investigative prosecutor, but the prosecutor did not consent to his transfer and did not accept the position offered.

Polt wrote that the service of two of the prosecutors involved in the criminal proceedings in the Simonka case was terminated by mutual agreement at the initiative of the prosecutors.

Last August, the Central Investigations Prosecutor’s Office filed charges against Simonka and 32 of his associates in the Metropolitan Court for criminal fraud and other crimes committed in a criminal organization, causing particularly significant material damage. In October, it turned out that the prosecution had also prosecuted Simonka’s wife, Simonkáné Gábor Marianna, and his niece, Renáta Tóth. According to the indictment, Simonka wove a network of companies with close relatives and trustees, the purpose of which was to obtain non-reimbursable subsidies from the EU and national budgets through fictitious investments, deceiving decision-makers.