[ad_1]
“I don’t quite understand it.” As we reported, the Molde coach reacted to the two penalty situations judged differently after Ferencváros’ away game with Norway (3-3). The green and white band started well to no avail at Molde’s home, with the host backtracking 0-2 in the second half. Igor Haratin needed a hair penalty for the FTC to save the game. But the penalty was blown by the referee after using a treatment without the use of a video referee monitor, something very similar was not hinted based on the VAR replay. In Norway the veracity of what happened was questioned.
 |
| The Norwegian referee says that Igor Haratin’s treatment would have been more than a penalty for judging viscerally (Photo: AFP, file) |
“I think the two convictions were a total mistake” – reacted to the two different judgments of a former FIFA judge visited by the Norwegian VG, By Ivar StabergThe decision was made in accordance with the spore withdrawn at the end of 2014, as if it had been made before the era of video evaluation, not the right way by the way.
Ad
“Moldé would have had the penalty, Ferencváros not. The use of VAR has completely changed the attitude of the referees. I find it incomprehensible why he used the video and then why not in another seemingly more questionable situation. I preferred the old rule when umpires had to weigh intention. According to today’s rules, if you enlarge your body with it, you will have to blow a penalty if you get the ball, it doesn’t matter. “
Staberg said changes to the double-stringent treatment rule in the past two years have now failed.
“I was just hoping I could get a good look at the second situation, I was prouder than having to say, okay, I was wrong after using the monitor.” Said the spanish Carrlos Del Cerro Grandéról former running mate.
The newspaper is Molde’s head coach, confused by the situations, Erling moe the previous excellence of Werder Bremen and the Norwegian national team, Rune Bratsethet He also spoke on the subject. The 60-time defender of the selection, as a former footballer, was a cashier, he would not have been sanctioned for either of the two situations.
“The defender was also simply beaten in the first case, and it is clear that Brynhildsen was also defenseless in the second case.” Bratseth said from the point of view of the players.
At the end of the article, the VG also discusses a number of posts on social media, some of which are more about not having to impose a penalty in any of the cases, or about the referee’s inconsistency, saying whether he looked back on the case in person in the first case. , I should have done the same in the second.
CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
SPRING, PLAYOFF (ROUND 4)
FIRST MATCH
MOLDE FK (NORWAY) –FERENCE CITY 3–3 (0-1)
Mold, Aker Stadium, behind closed doors, Directed by: From Cerro Grande (spanyol)
Mold: Linde-Wingo, Gregersen, Ellingsen, Haugen-Aursnes, Hussain-E. Hestad, Wolff Eikrem (Omoijuanfo, 81.), Knudtzon (Brynhildsen, 57.) – L. James (Bolly, 89.). Coach: Erling moe
Ferencváros: Dibusz – Botka, Frimpong, Blazic, Civic – Laidouni, Haratin, Somalia (Sigér D., 70.) – Nguen (Isael, 88), F. Boli (Zubkov, 73), Uzuni. Coach: Serhiy Rebrov
Gólszerző: L. James (55th), Wolff Eikrem (65th), Ellingsen (83rd), sick. F. Boli (7th), Uzuni (52nd), Haratin (87th-11th Esből)
The rematch will take place on Tuesday, September 29, starting at 9 pm, at the Groupama Arena.
LIVE BROADCAST, INTERESTING DATA, STATISTICS HERE!
[ad_2]
