[ad_1]
According to the resolution signed by the vast majority of the heads of the Regional Organizations of the Hungarian Medical Chamber (MOK), the dangers of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which has been gaining more and more publicity and volume in recent weeks , groups questioning the importance of defense, prominent physicians, pharmacists and other self-appointed judges with qualifications,
the MOK wrote in its statement Thursday.
As explained, the MOK is not tasked with disproving conspiracy theories, and free speech typically includes spreading all sorts of non-scientific nonsense, but since there is one of the top MOK officials among the speakers, more precisely the regional organization of Heves County. the locally elected president and the doctrines he disseminates jeopardize the effectiveness of the fight against the epidemic and, therefore, they are forced to speak out.
In this way, the MOK leadership is distancing itself Dr. Alfred Pócs statements made by an orthopedic surgeon, a 5G activist fighter, and a senior member of the Association of Physicians for Clairvoyance in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, calling a very significant portion of them scientifically unfounded, misleading and false. Similarly, we distance ourselves from members of our own chamber. Dr. Tamasi József, outside our camera, among others Dr. György Gődény Conspiracy theories that proclaim the threat of the current coronavirus epidemic as hysteria caused by the media and various governments and other “background powers” deny the scientifically multiplied importance of distance and the use of masks to slow the spread of the virus. viruses, as well as general anti-vaccination. . His teachings have been refuted in detail by many, in many places.
They added that as Pócs had repeatedly implemented it despite strong resolutions and requests from the MOK leadership and Regional Organization leaders, despite his call, his name appeared again as the MOK Heves County President, it is that is, an official of the MOK and not a private person. the lives of older people and those working in epidemiological control have been undermined and the credibility of the MOK as a public body has been undermined, so the MOK Board makes an ethical statement against it.
The MOK does not claim that it could not have been questioned between the spring or the current epidemiological measures, but emphasized that its reservations and suggestions were always communicated to decision makers and published. They are of the firm opinion that “the management of any high-risk health emergency can only be organized in an organized way by the corresponding official body, following a rational decision based on the scientific information available.”
Of course, there is room for debate on medical and care issues in addressing the COVID-19 problem, but this should not lead to misleading the public, minimizing risks backed by scientific evidence, and undermining public confidence in vaccines. .
Featured Image: 24.hu/Marjai János
[ad_2]
