[ad_1]
To our question, the opinion portal revealed why the response given by the Prime Minister to György Soros’s article was not published.
When we decided whether to accept the texts sent voluntarily, we considered it a primary duty to promote public debate, and we have concluded that Prime Minister Orbán’s comment did not meet the standard we demanded.
He wrote Project Syndicate in response.
We wrote before Viktor Orban answered in the article György soros However, in writing this, he claimed that it could not have appeared where Soros’ article was. A page called Project Syndicate now admitted our question that Orbán’s article had not actually been published, for the reason above.
Soros Europe must face Hungary and Poland wrote an opinion piece for Project Syndicate a week ago. In the Hungarian Prime Minister’s interpretation, “Soros issued open orders to the leaders of the European Union. In it, he asks them to severely punish member states that do not want to join a unifying European empire under the banner of a global and open society.
In its response, Project Syndicate notes that they can also be published by scientists, business and political leaders, and civil activists, but the same guidelines apply to all. They also linked their policies, which are publicly available.
The guidelines state:
The ideal Project Syndicate commentary is an intellectual argument or public policy proposal that aims to inform readers and open up public debate. Project Syndicate does not publish articles that do not meet or undermine these purposes.
After explaining the guidelines, it is noted that the communication is at the sole discretion of the editors.
[ad_2]
