László Földi: About József Szájer “every secret service knew where he belonged in terms of his gender identity”



[ad_1]

The former intelligence officer confirmed this to the Hungarian Nation several times.

In an interview with the newspaper, the former director of Operations of the Information Office József Szájer He was the victim of an intelligence operation. László Földi according to him, the politician was an objective person. When asked about the Magyar Nemzet, the former intelligence officer said that the curfew imposed by the coronavirus epidemic was a good opportunity, since for him it was quite obvious about József Szájer.

all the secret services knew where they belonged in terms of their gender identity, which communities they visited. Presumably, an acquaintance who was moving in similar circles, fulfilling a mission, simply invited him to the party. They appeared above the allowed number in the meeting, so the violation of the law occurred immediately.

Since József Szájer tried to escape, he violated the curfew, if we accept that he did not know about the pills, then

someone put his illicit drugs in his backpack.

To suggest to the newspaper that this is just speculation, responds László Földi, who knows the operation of the secret services, it is clear what happened, this is confirmed by the fact that politics had to agree to such action.

After all, as I have already mentioned, Szájer’s gender identity had been a fact known to all intelligence agencies for many years.

The timing of the action makes it completely clear to the leak that Szájer was duped into the Hungarian-Polish veto to indicate

careful, we know a lot about you.

According to László Földi, József Szájer was not really blackmailed, because all the partners knew about it.

In Western Europe, homosexuality is more elegant than objectionable. But given the circumstances, due to the austerity measures imposed by the epidemic, the politician committed violations of the law, which led to the murder of characters.

Hungarian intelligence, on the responsibility of the Information Office (MA), thought that it was not possible to know what information they had, if they had warned a politician, but in the current tense political situation, even friendly partners could act against the interests of the country and matters.



[ad_2]