[ad_1]
The Mansion rejected Budapest Pride’s lawsuit Tuesday, in which the community complained that police had banned the Pride car parade, citing the epidemic situation, based on a government decree categorically banning a gathering. The Mansion writes that the police decision was legal,
the assembly authority (police) could not consider the individual circumstances of the given assembly in its decision making.
By December 10, Budapest Pride reportedly announced a movement of cars on the pier to protest against the impossibility of adoption and the amendment of the Basic Law on World Human Rights Day.
Amendment 9 to the Basic Law deals in detail with Christian education, it was included in the Basic Law at the suggestion of the ruling parties that, the mother is a woman, the father is a man. You can read a detailed summary of the topic here:
Parliament passed new amendments to the Basic Law.
By enforcing adoption, they are subject to ministerial permission for gay, single and cohabiting couples to raise children. The Helsinki Committee approached the Ombudsman.
According to the human rights organization, Ákos Kozma must speak out against the infringing drafts.
Indicate only at home, between the four walls
The Mansion left the BRFK’s decision in place. Police did not allow the parade, citing the fact that the government decree on protective measures prohibits all gatherings during an emergency. According to the organizers of Pride, the event was going to be carried out with great care due to the epidemic, sitting in closed cars, wearing a mask and at a safe distance from each other, with the participation of up to 30 people, which was no different.
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS, ACTIVITIES, SHOPPING, PURCHASE DEPARTMENTS, PARKING LOTS OR ANY ROADS ARE FREE.
Viktória Radványi, one of the organizers of the Budapest Pride, told the Index about the impossible demonstration that there was no need for a government decree banning the assembly, because the police have the opportunity to try individual cases. According to him, the ban on assembly restricts fundamental human rights.
In a situation where it is not possible to meet, not to express an opinion by demonstration, no constitutional amendment should be made that seriously violates the rights of a minority.
– He said.
According to the Helsinki Committee, the police prohibited holding a demonstration that did not represent a risk to the epidemic situation. The defense organization asked the Curia to initiate a review of the rules of the government decree that uniformly and categorically prohibits all demonstrations before the Constitutional Court. The Mansion replied:
Undoubtedly, it can be affirmed that the adoption of restrictive measures based on the enabling provision was justified by the safety of life and health of the citizens, in this regard the Curia did not detect any unconstitutionality.
Public money is the income, expenses and accounts receivable of the state.
[ad_2]
