[ad_1]
Donald Trump was delighted to see the Capitol site, “Republican Senator Ben Sasse from Nebraska said on a radio show quoting his White House adviser. According to the senator
Trump was delighted to see the riots as he watched the events unfolding in the White House and did not understand why his advisers around him were unhappy with him.
This may explain why the president has put off hours calling on his supporters to end the riots and go home.
I have no idea what was on his mind, what exactly he wanted, what would happen next (the riots – ed.) They were already inside the Capitol, but certainly the chaos
– said the senator, who was among the first to indicate his support for the constitutional impeachment against the president.
That Donald Trump really thought he could avoid Congressional verification of Democratic President Joe Biden’s victory by Congress with confusion.
Throughout the liberal press, American politicians blamed the president for what happened, and the riots were described as a deliberate and pre-planned coup attempt.
There are several indications that the siege of the Capitol was not due to a sudden uprising. Even on December 19, the president of the United States tweeted that “there will be a big wild demonstration in the capital on January 6.” His followers, emboldened by this, began to organize, among other things, on the Parler community application, which practically disappeared from the internet after the riots.
It is also illustrative that the entire Trump family saw the crowd coming to the rally in Washington from a kind of operations center, about which Donald Trump Jr. also recorded video. You and your loved one, Kimerly Guilfoyle, also encouraged the president’s supporters to fight.
The Trump family hosted a party to watch the terrorist attack at the United States Capitol. Kimberly Guilfoyle and Don Jr say “fight” with sick joy as they count towards the insurrection. Donald Trump looks at the screen, waiting for the violence he incited.pic.twitter.com/4R3HoHmIeW
– Stephanie Kennedy (@WordswithSteph) January 7, 2021
An insider job?
Congressional politicians and several former and former acting security representatives expressed the view that Congressional police and other security agencies did not adequately assess the threat posed by the crowd of Trump supporters. The riots went through the congressional police and waist-high lanyards that they installed like a hot knife, and some law enforcement officers, according to various videos, did not even face the crowd, let alone give them free rein.
There were also times when intruders in the building paid the police themselves.
It’s a dark day in America when a US Capitol police officer decides to take a selfie with a TERRORIST! And they wonder why WE don’t feel safe! pic.twitter.com/UZsLnS2s68
– NAACP (@NAACP) January 6, 2021
Democrats, for this reason, blame congressional police for colluding with the riots and mentioning racial profiling, saying that police officers do not appear to treat white protesters as they say against African Americans or other minorities.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Homeland Security did not issue a report on the potential threat posed by the protest, despite the fact that Trump supporters organized under their noses in cyberspace, although it is a practice of routine before any major movement.
In a circular, the competent authorities inform federal, state and local law enforcement officials about their assessment of what to expect at events, assisting in preparations to secure the event.
And before Wednesday’s events, the Pentagon restricted the capital’s National Guard, banning the use of firearms, the use of assault equipment, contact with protesters for self-defense, and sharing their equipment with local authorities. The reason is that the National Guard was not asked to demonstrate or disperse the crowd.
After a massive intrusion into the United States Legislature building, the congressional police chief telephoned the military to send in reinforcements in the form of the National Guard. The request was not rejected, but it was not immediately granted. The military was concerned that the military was invading the Capitol. Finally, the Pentagon mobilized the Metropolitan Guard, lifting some restrictions, but still not allowing the use of firearms. And his job was to secure the building complex, which he left to Congressional Police and local and federal police forces to clean it up.
In light of the cutting edge, the question arises: Was Trump sent into the highest leadership circles by allowing rioters free access to the Capitol? This is a blow to the authority of the president, confirming what Democrats and various Republicans have long been saying: The president is in public danger.
He never, however, the sight
Among others, Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic speaker of the House of Representatives, proposed after the events of Wednesday that the president be removed from power immediately. This is provided for in Article 4 of Supplement 25 to the United States Constitution, but would require the help of Vice President Mike Pence. In practice, it would appear that Pence and the majority of the Cabinet are declaring in writing that Trump is in no condition to do his job. This would take over the vice presidency, and while Trump can challenge the measure in Congress, he has twenty-one days to decide on the president’s appeal.
However, the vice president, who broke spectacularly with Trump, showed no willingness to implement the constitutional amendment. The reason for this is likely that Trump continues to enjoy the support of Republican voters and, if attacked within the party, they could lose those voters. With such a jerk, they would risk another riot as well. So there is still no unanimity among Republican politicians on the issue.
However, Democrats are adamant and will begin the constitutional impeachment process in the House of Representatives next week to replace the president. If the impeachment is successful in the Democratic majority House of Representatives, where simple majority approval is required, the Senate will have the power to negotiate impeachment and pass judgment.
Based on internal correspondence, the Senate could address proceedings no earlier than one day before the end of Trump’s term on January 19, and the hearing could take place without Trump as president. Opinions are divided that the procedure could be carried out this way, but if so, there would be an advantage:
Trump would no longer be president, so he could not pressure Republicans in this capacity.
Although he no longer knows much, since he was banished from his main communication channels. Twitter banned it forever, and along with Facebook, Snapchat, Twitch, and Shopify, they suspended Trump’s account indefinitely.
If the impeachment still reaches the negotiation stage, the Senate can, in addition to convicting Trump, also decide to ban him from holding public office forever. And that would prevent him from running for president again in 2024.
However, this requires the consent of two-thirds of the Senate, which means: all Republicans stand or fall.
The question is what fate the Republican Party intends for Trump to have. The president’s activities are known to have created a dividing line within the political bloc. If they get rid of Trump once and for all, they could lose voters, but there would also be an opportunity for the party to unite and renew itself, while other ambitious politicians would face the obstacle manifested in Trump’s personality to run for the presidency in 2024.
Trump will not disappear from public life in one fell swoop, and his influence and level of support will already depend on whether Biden manages to unite the politically polarized country as promised.
(Cover image: protesters outside the Capitol building in Washington on January 6, 2021. Photo: Leah Willis / Getty Images)
[ad_2]
