[ad_1]
The MSZP curator of the Public Service Public Foundation acted in this way. Anyway, the board concluded that everything was fine with public television.
Three members of the board of directors of the Public Service Foundation, which oversees public service, delegated by the opposition, jointly submitted a proposal requesting the board to direct questions to the Public Service Board, which oversees the principles of public service.
The questions concerned sound recordings published by Free Europe, which show the editorial principles of public television in Hungary. We write more about these here, Balázs Bende, M1’s editor-in-chief (pictured) spoke on the recording, among others, before last year’s election campaign to the EP:
Everyone is aware that there will be elections to the European Parliament at the end of May, and I am sure that no one will be surprised if I say that it is true that the opposition in this institution is not in favor of the coalition. If this statement reaches someone unexpectedly, go home now.
The eight-member body, with three members from the opposition, three members from Fidesz and two members from the Media Council, voted against the proposal at a ratio of 5-3 (the opposition remained, by definition).
László KránitzAccording to the MSZP delegate curator, it was surprising in itself that the proposal was on the agenda, but then it became clear why.
Then they came up with another motion for a resolution, the essence of which was that everything is fine in the public media, the edition is independent, but they warned me because I signed a letter with the co-chair of the MSZP.
Kránitz told 24.hu.
The letter With Ágnes Kunhalmi They were jointly noted and questions about the public television scandal addressed to the Media Council were also included, but Kránitz said it was not a statement but questions. In accordance with the decision, however, he received a warning for being politicized by the party with a jointly signed letter, which is prohibited for members of the public foundation’s board of trustees (although they were mostly delegated by the parties).
[ad_2]
