Péter Polt’s written response revealed that the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Capital would assess whether the installation of the transformer plant was legal.

Ágnes Vadai, Member of Parliament for the DK, addressed a written question to Attorney General Péter Polt in a XII. district fork or transformer station installed to power it.

The case is interesting because the house on Felhő Street was built by Valton-Sec Kft. Co-owner István Bessenyei and his wife, Kata Sarka, and moved there for a time last year. 24.hu According to Chancellor Antal Rogán and his then wife, Cecília Rogán-Gaál.

Not far from the village, ELMŰ installed a transformer station this summer, despite local protests, claiming it will serve dozens of married customers. HE 24.hu However, according to the article, residents of the area obtained documentation of the works and it turned out that the facility was built solely thanks to the property’s power supply on Cloud Street.

Ágnes Vadai tried to find out from Péter Polt, referring to the above, if the ELM sub subcontractor Zrt. You broke the law by installing the high-performance transformer station. Polt responded to the deputy that he had forwarded the content of his question to the Metropolitan Prosecutor’s Office for their consideration.


The number of independent editorial boards from power is steadily declining, and those that still exist are trying to stay afloat in a growing headwind. At HVG we persevere, we don’t give in to pressure and we bring national and international news every day.

That is why we ask you, our readers, to support us, support us, join our membership and renew it!

And we promise to keep doing our best for you in all circumstances!

Questions from Ágnes Vadai about buying a fan landed on the police


hvg.hu
At home

The representative asked Attorney General Péter Polt about the medical devices purchased through the Slovenian company.

Polt sent Vada to court of registry over NGO conflict of interest


hvg.hu
At home

Péter Polt did not feel competent on the Vadai issue, which concerned a large businessman whose company had earned HUF 1.7 billion from the Hungarian Tourism Agency for hotel development, while in Bahart he was chairman of the board.