Hadházy managed to extract a single piece of information from the director of the Szekszárd hospital

Ákos Hadházy, an independent representative, achieved few results when he was able to meet with the director of the Szekszárd hospital on Monday after several attempts.

Hadházy has been trying to get information on the hospital epidemic for months, but has also been unsuccessful at the National Center for Public Health and the Administrator of the National Health Insurance Fund. Hospitals cannot respond to him, nor can the press, according to a ministerial instruction, direct those concerned to the operational tribe. However, information is also difficult to obtain.

Hadházy kept asking the director in vain about how many coronavirus patients are currently being treated, how many have been treated so far, how many have died in total or even divided into days. Nor has he received an answer on whether a patient with a crown dies not in the intensive care unit but in the ward. Csaba Németh referred to ministerial instruction at all times.

It turned out that in peacetime, 16 intensive care units are operated with 32 trained nurses, so they can guarantee that there is a nurse for two patients on each shift. Now, however, 57 intensive care units treat coronary patients and maintain seven additional beds for people with other illnesses, with the same number of nurses.

According to the director, the number of intensive care nurses per patient depends on the position.

In any case, they have 32 specialist nurses for a total of 64 intensive care units, which, as Hadházy writes, either means that there are eight patients per nurse instead of two, or that workers have to work long overtime.This is a critical issue because the number of accompanying intensive care physicians and nurses is key to the survival of patients with severe coronary conditions. The fewer patients a hospital worker reaches, the better they can pay attention to them and detect when their condition worsens.

Previously, doctors had also tried to obtain hospital data from each other, but in the end they could not make it public because a professional association created by the government had issued a separate call not to give information to anyone. This would be important not only so that the public can monitor where and with what results care is delivered, but also because doctors and nurses could be more effective if they knew where, what method is in place, what would be worth taking.

An intensive care specialist working in England said his colleagues in Hungary should work like a pilot who has to find the track without traffic lights.

Not only is it broken down into hospitals, we don’t even know nationwide how many coronary patients are being seen in the intensive care unit. Sometimes they are only revealed in a separate question.