[ad_1]
On Tuesday, Parliament voted to amend the electoral law, which requires parties that want to establish a national list to run in 71 individual electoral districts in the future instead of the current 27. Fidesz would have initially increased the number of candidates required for the list to 50 (in nine counties), but János Volner at his suggestion, this eventually rose to two-thirds of the districts. Therefore, it is almost certain that the amendment will force the opposition parties to form a common list, which, however, has been open to it for some time.
It is memorable that Zsolt Semjén The deputy prime minister presented the bill to reform the law on November 10 at 11:59 p.m., arguing that they would take measures against the camouflage parties formed by the support of the State.
Although pro-government MPs in the Legislative Committee also supported the opposition amendment, which sought to improve the proportion of individual electoral districts in Pest County, they had already voted against it in the final vote, so it was not accepted by the majority. . However, the basis of the Dialogue proposal Ilona Pálffy, at the initiative of the outgoing President of the National Electoral Office.
Parliament also voted Tuesday on the ninth amendment to the Constitution.
By adopting this, it was included in the Basic Law that:
Hungary protects the institution of marriage as a cohesive life between a man and a woman, as well as the family as the basis for the survival of the nation. The basis of the family relationship is marriage and the relationship between parents and children. The mother is a woman, the father is a man.
In addition to:
Every child has the right to the protection and care necessary for their physical, mental and moral development. Hungary protects children’s right to self-identity according to their birth gender and provides education in accordance with values based on Hungarian constitutional identity and Christian culture.
It was also enshrined in the constitution that foundations that perform a public function can only be accessed by a two-thirds majority (therefore, even liquidated).
These organizations, which have received significant state assets, are mostly run by government appointees, possibly members of the government. According to the official justification, the measure was necessary to enshrine the independence of government foundations through “constitutional protection” and provide them with long-term stability in the performance of their public functions.
[ad_2]
