[ad_1]
A veto is needed to avoid a mechanism that would abusively deprive Member States of EU funds and, more importantly, is contrary to the EU Treaty.
This was stated by Mateusz Morawiecki, an economic news site called Puls Biznesu in Poland. The interview appeared at 8pm on Sunday evening, it was reviewed by the Polish news agency PAP on Monday afternoon and although the words are very strong, it is unclear whether they reflect the latest Polish position, that is, whether this can already be understood as an indication of the Polish Prime Minister’s rejection of the final proposal.
As we wrote: on Monday morning, one of the EU’s top anonymity officials said that they would wait for a signal from the two Member States by tomorrow at the latest if they maintained their veto, because if so, the EU would move forward with 25 states members in the recovery fund. and your budget will continue to operate with the emergency solution.
According to the Polish newspaper, Morawiecki indicated that even if there was no compromise between the two Member States and the EU leadership on budgetary and rule of law issues, the EU could continue to operate on a reduced budget and Poland could continue to fight for the better conditions. . As previously noted by the Hungarian Prime Minister, the Pole said in the interview that regardless of the discussions, the Polish government will also announce the new EU tenders and move forward with developments, so
there are no fears that this EU emergency budget will have a significant impact on the Polish economy.
When asked if a debate had broken out over Poland’s (Polexit) exit from the EU, Morawiecki replied that this view was always raised by the opposition when the Polish government engaged in a budget debate with the EU. According to him, “the question of Polish membership in the EU should be explored in a serious debate, which, of course, can sometimes be too crude, but always between partners.”
As you’ve said multiple times in recent weeks, in this interview:
Poland is interested in staying in the EU, but that does not mean that we have to meet all expectations.
He noted that each member state has its own interests and, for example, recalled that Poland is also pushing for a reform of the EU tax haven status. He said he should ask himself why Poland is at the crossroads of the rule of law debate when it begins to push for a change in the tax havens situation in EU forums.
Although Morawircki did not refer to him according to the review, he certainly did refer to the situation in the Netherlands, for example. However, forcing the issue can be uncomfortable in terms of communication with the Hungarian-Polish strategic alliance, because Hungary is also becoming a growing tax haven in the eyes of many member states due to its particularly favorable tax environment. This summer we wrote a comprehensive analysis on how the EU budget position of tight-fisted countries mixes with the defense around their status as a tax haven. In it, we noted that the Dutch are reluctant to make greater EU contributions despite benefiting greatly from the tax haven status.
[ad_2]
