[ad_1]
A video conference of the leaders of member states on Thursday on the new EU budget and recovery fund, adopted by the European Parliament but supplemented by the rule of law mechanism suspended by the vetoes of Hungary and Poland. Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa joined the questions in just under a quarter of an hour. Charles Michel, President of the European Council (EiT), opened the debate and instead the parties agreed on a coronavirus epidemic, so the next vaccine program was also discussed.
The leaders of the 27 member states of the European Union met Thursday in a video conference. Although in recent days Hungarian Prime Ministers Viktor Orbán and Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki were expected to be the main protagonists, as the new EU seven-year budget linked to the rule of law mechanism adopted earlier has been vetoed this week and the dream recovery fund for the epidemic. The two member states, who are already being prosecuted under Article 7 for violations of democratic values, argue that the new system would seriously undermine each country’s sovereignty.
This is also what EU leaders have been talking about during the week: more recently, Romanian Prime Minister Ludovic Orban indicated that the two renitents should not hang up, while Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa lined up alongside the two. critics (enraging his own coalition But also the German government holding the rotating EU presidency and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, who had already suggested that the EU would function well without the Poles and Hungarians, but harshly criticized in any case to the Hungarian leadership for their footsteps.
However, the original topics of the meeting did not include the debate and veto on the rule of law, but the program envisaged for member states to agree on health cooperation during the epidemic and discuss a joint vaccination program, which would focus on the rich and the differences between the poorest countries are resolved and a timely and adequate supply of vaccines is available everywhere and when it is ready. Charles Michel, President of EiT, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, also chaired the meeting.
Orbán, Morawiecki and Jansa, who had taken their turn, shared their concerns for 15 minutes.
At a press conference after the event, journalists from Deutsche Welle and France24 also tried to find out what the budget was like via the internet, but Michel and von der Leyen briefly indicated that the three member states had concerns and would discuss the issue in early December. .
“There is also a compromise proposal on the table. The point is that we agree as soon as possible, because the people of Europe, small businesses and companies have help, we need to show them that we want and can act for them,” he said Michel on financial programs.
On another matter, Michel limited himself to saying that “there are several options on the table, but now is not the time to discuss them, but to decide how to implement the decisions taken jointly with the European Parliament.”
Taking him at his word, von der Leyen also spoke of “this is a negotiation process where an attempt is made to reach an agreement and incorporate the proposals into the existing framework.” He then stressed the need to decide on financial issues in December.
Slovenia talks about the coast
Slovenia’s role was discussed ambiguously at the press conference, but Jansa is expected not to side with the two V4 countries (the Czech Republic and Slovakia soon joined forces with the other countries and currently support the state mechanism of law). At home, he tried to alleviate the tense situation with a letter published at the same time as the EU summit:
“Reality always wins, Slovenia is not Hungary and it never will be, but I oppose the demonization of Poland and Hungary because it is not useful and it is myopic thinking. Now we have to agree to a compromise because we need resources,” Delo wrote in a letter. according to whether. He defended the rule of law in the two countries, for example, arguing that he sees particularly balanced media in these places. But he hasn’t written about vetoing it yet, and the need to compromise is more of an indication that he doesn’t want to get in the way.
[ad_2]
