[ad_1]
The secret history of the 2018 elections in 84 color pages.
I’ll buy it
Anyone who wanted to escape the depressing conditions brought on by the pandemic for at least a day could not have found a better program than Wednesday’s parliamentary debate day, where even at 11 o’clock they debated who counts as female or male while emptying public money. concept.
Now there has been a general debate on Amendment 9 to the Basic Law, which, in addition to recording a sub-government, states that “the mother is a woman, the father is a manIt would also stipulate that, for example, the MCC, which recently became flooded with stocks and real estate, and other public interest trusts that perform public functions, would only be protected by a two-thirds law. In addition, the concept of public money would be defined to apply only to the income, expenses and claims of the state, because in the past there were still serious disputes about whether, for example, TAO money counted.
Although Judit Varga, who introduced the amendments, had complained a day earlier on the BBC’s Hard Talk program that the EU was not focusing on COVID and the crisis, but on pushing ideological debates, Parliament was immersed in the one hour debate. , as if for that reason a curfew had been imposed.
Judit Varga introduced the proposed constitutional amendment in the midst of the epidemic from the beginning saying: “a progressive set of thoughts that some also create in relation to both sexes is a growing concern ”. Therefore, in his opinion, the Constituent Assembly should state more clearly than before “Guarantees of the rights of children and future generations.”. According to the Minister of Justice, the gender of the parents should be prescribed at the constitutional level for “because we can’t become denials of biology”. But the minister said the samethat “the goal is not to undermine the rights of particular social groups“But also”promote the protection of the most vulnerable”. Judit Varga also said that „Birth is not a matter of faith, or ideology, or self-confidence, but rather a biological gift that cannot be changed.”.
However, at a later point in the debate, Fidesz’s Gábor Bányai approached exactly what such a threat posed to children’s right to self-identity, when he told Dora Dúró, who was fighting storybooks:
„down with the hat before grinding, although that book has unfortunately become very popular ”.
And the Minister of Justice said about trust insurance that in doing so, the legislator “believes in the separation of public and private lawAnd it ensures the independence of the public interest trusts of the current government.
Fatalities attack us everywhere
Fidesz keynote speaker Mónika Dunai saw the situation as even more dangerous than the minister, who said the limited but globally organized interest groups They are already attacking the natural order of the world, but they are not escaping Christian culture either. “An organized attack has been launched against the values shared by Fidesz-KDNP and the Hungarians, and even the majority of the world.”He shocked the half dozen deputies who were sitting in the Chamber. It says that anyone who attacks the current amendment does not recognize the rights of the child. “The fact that the mother is a woman and the father a man, honorable representatives of ladies and gentlemen, was not invented by Fidesz. If I think so, this was the case with your family, in the case of your parents, otherwise you wouldn’t be sitting here now. ” Monika Dunai declared.
KDNP’s Imre Vejkey is already on the DARK PAGE and “devastation running towards us”He took the fight against:
They just divert attention from the theft as the plains believer camp grows
But of course there were those who were more skeptical, for example, according to the conversationalist Tímea Szabó, with these amendments they only want to divert attention from the robberies. “They thought they would cast a hook and the opposition would start talking about a mother being a woman, a father and a man.[…] Do you really think we have to talk about this today? Who questioned that a mother is a woman? You are doing this because you believe that is what we are going to talk about then, and not that you want to legalize the fact that billions of billions are being taken out of public money right now.”
According to Szabó, the Basic Law has not defined the concept of public money separately until now, because everyone except Fidesz knew about it. “Public money is what we don’t steal. Public money is what belongs to the Hungarian people, what belongs to everyone, what should be spent on health care, education, livelihoods and people’s well-being, not the hotels of L derinc Mészáros, the luxury properties of István Tiborcz, the fashion companies of Ráhel Orbán and others.Said the deputy, to whom János Latorcai, who chaired the meeting, spoke shortly after, so as not to threaten his colleagues with jail if possible. But according to Szabó, prison is not a threat, but a promise.
The socialist Tamás Harangozó compared it to a government that regularly cooks a minority, as when children burn ants with a magnifying glass. However, the second part of the proposalthe incorporation of institutionalized theft into the Basic Law”. He said it was about evacuating the assets of the foundation while the board of directors was planted with its own people. The new definition of public money, for example, also removes control of TAO money. But Dániel Z. Kárpát de Jobbik also saw that the government, hidden behind the traditional family model, wanted to speed up the calculation of public funds. Gergely Arató from the SE spoke about the fact that members of the government parties “In Polish style, he fell in love with a kind of homophobic campaign aimed at harassing and assaulting one or another group of people.”.
According to pro-government MPs, this needs to be addressed at the time of the epidemic because the epidemic measures were already handed over to the government by the parliament with the empowerment law anyway, so the legislature must now continue with the normal agenda, which is what debates like these mean. In any case, Fidesz managed to make the nearly 6-hour debate primarily about gender issues. Why it is important to include the gender of the parents in the Basic Law, however, László Nacsa of the KDNP explained that the entire Western world is became a prisoner of gender ideology, and he cited, as an example, that there was a bill in France to change the names father and mother on school forms to father 1 and father 2. (This was eventually rejected).
Fidesz’s Gábor Bányai also said that, of all the amendments, our future depends mainly on this, and not on the definition of public money or the transfer of assets from the foundation.
Of course, in such cases, the debates drag on until late at night, while MEPs say whatever they say, in addition to Fidesz, there is a two-thirds majority to accept the proposal anyway. It is no coincidence that Tímea Szabó also tabled an amendment stating that Viktor Orbán is a man and Lőrinc Mészáros is a man. And at some point, Attila Mesterházy would have added to the constitutional amendment that due to the increase in the number of believers in the plain, it would not hurt to register that the Earth is round. And around 10:45 p.m. at Jobbik’s György Szilágyi, something finally broke:
[ad_2]
