[ad_1]
Community sites, primarily restaurants, cafes, gyms, and other enclosed venues, were responsible for roughly eighty percent of coronavirus infections in the first months of the epidemic, according to an analysis by experts from several renowned universities and research firms. scientist in the United States. in a study published in the scientific journal Nature.
Researchers from renowned Stanford and Northwestern universities, as well as Microsoft Research and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, modeled the movements of some 98 million residents of ten cities in the United States, based on mobile phone data from March 1 to March 2. of May. They determined which places and how many were visited, and then calculated how many people were present at that time per square meter at that time.
They also provided data on how many infections may have occurred at the site and showed that only a small number of so-called superdistribution site is responsible for most infections; read on the LiveScience science news portal.
Restaurants are by far the riskiest places, four times riskier than gyms and cafes, as hotels continue to hunt for new infections.
– read the website of the American newspaper The New York Times, to which Jure Leskovecet, a researcher at Stanford University, commented.
The danger of so-called super-distribution sites is that more people stay there at the same time and for a longer period of time. Researchers have found that, for example, if restaurants allow only twenty percent of their capacity to be used, it will reduce the number of infections in these restaurants by eighty percent, while they can retain about sixty percent of your guests.
Public health experts have noted that many of the new epidemics in the United States today are the result of smaller gatherings in people’s homes.
The president of the European Commission mentioned the fight against the epidemic and climate protection as examples of cooperation between the EU and the United States.
[ad_2]
