[ad_1]
What you need to know every morning.
The National Council of Judges (OBT) has issued a resolution declaring that it does not support the election of the candidate Zsolt András Varga as president of the Curia.
As they wrote, the OBT personally listened to the candidate according to the relevant laws, learned of his professional biography, asked him questions, and then concluded that they did not support Varga.
According to their reasoning, the OBT recognizes Varga’s merits in the scientific field, his experience in the judiciary in general as a constitutional judge and deputy chief prosecutor, and his personal qualities and abilities. It was convincing and reassuring for members of the OBT what Varga said at the hearing about the destructive effect of the legal unit, the authority of the judiciary and the public criticism of recent cases in public cases.
“However, it cannot be inferred from the fact that the candidate has not previously carried out any judicial activity in the judicial system, has no experience in the courtroom, and has no practical background in litigation and judicial administration. Since the regime change, only one person who previously served as a judge for a longer or shorter period of time has served as president of the Supreme Court and the Curia. “
– are written in the decision. The OBT also recalls that András Zsolt Varga’s candidacy was already possible thanks to two recent amendments to the law, which “cannot comply with the constitutional expectation that a person who appears impartial before other independent observers from other branches of power must be at the top of the judicial system.
In view of the above, the National Council of Judges did not support the election of the President of the Curia ”.
– The decision is concluded, which is registered by the municipal body chosen by the judges from among them, the National Council of the Judiciary.
[ad_2]
