[ad_1]
Subscribe to the Epidemic Newsletter
We send you what you need to know about the epidemic every day of the week. Sign up and take care of each other!
US Democratic politicians promise to increase the membership of the Supreme Court in the event of a possible presidential victory if the Republican majority in the Senate now votes for Trump’s candidate.
Several Democratic lawmakers indicated on Twitter Sunday that they would increase the number of members of the federal supreme court that serves as the Constitutional Court.
An influential MP, Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that if President Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell, the Republican Majority Leader in the Senate, approve the nomination and the Senate votes for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s successor , who passed away on Friday, the presidential elections the new Senate must take immediate steps to expand the Supreme Court.
According to Nadler, the Senate vote before the presidential election is undemocratic and is a “clear violation of people’s confidence in an elected office.” Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ed Markey, also on Twitter, said: “Mitch McConnell has set a precedent. In an election year, we do not replace a missing member of the federal court. If (McConnell) breaks this, then if the Democrats get a majority in the next Senate, … we need to expand the Supreme Court. “
Increasing the size of the federal Supreme Court is not a completely new idea. Analysts recall that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt already tried in 1937, but to no avail, and that this attempt even divided the Democratic Party for many years.
Analysts close to the Republicans also recall that in 2016, the year of the presidential election, when Antonin Scalia, a conservative member of the Constitutional Court, passed away, the now deceased Ruth Bader Ginsburg urged Democrats to hear a new candidate for judge. The Fox television analyst quoted Ginsburg in a summer 2016 interview for The New York Times. “Nothing in the constitution says that the president will cease to be president in the last year of his term,” Ruth Bader Ginsburg said four years ago.
In 2016, the last year of his presidency, Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland to replace Scalia, who was ultimately not elected Chief Justice by the Republican majority in the Senate.
In the United States, when and who can appoint a chief judge is very important because for a long time the number of judges from the liberal and conservative sides within the board has been roughly balanced. If Republicans nominate again now, the balance will tip significantly towards them. But if, after the election, Joe Biden becomes president and the Senate has a Democratic majority, they can try to expand the court staff in various ways, gaining the right to nominate for the vacancies. (via MTI)
[ad_2]
