Brexit: panic, warnings, cries for help: is it the beginning or the end?



[ad_1]

Tensions are rising between the UK and the European Union, the Irish prime minister warns, publicists are asking for help after the London government openly pledged to start last year’s divorce deal with the EU.

Irish Prime Minister Michael Martin has asked the British government to stop overwriting part of the Brexit deal reached a year ago because it risks losing the trust of EU member states, making it impossible to conclude a free agreement. EU-UK trade, wrote the Financial Times. . He said the move calls into question whether the Boris Johnson government wants to agree with the union on future economic relations or not, raising the question of whether it deliberately wants to provoke indifference from the other party.

The London government presented the so-called Internal Market Act to Parliament on September 9, with the aim of regulating the internal economic order of the Member States of the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) after independence in January . It would annul certain points of the divorce agreement reached last year, which is an international agreement.

The two most important are that the new legislation would allow companies wishing to transport goods from Northern Ireland to Great Britain, i.e. England, Scotland or Wales, to be exempted from completing the export declaration, and the British government would not consult with the European Union. with state aid that it would also grant to companies in Northern Ireland. The first would allow to take advantage of the economic advantages of the EU in the UK market, the second could give British companies a competitive advantage in the EU market.

Voltage and tension

At the same time as the Irish warning, extraordinary talks between Cabinet Minister Michael Gove and European Commissioner Maros Sefcovic began in London, the BBC wrote. The EU hopes that the British side will clarify its intentions. Meanwhile, the two main negotiators, David Frost of the United Kingdom and Michel Barnier of the EU, also picked up the thread of negotiations on the long-awaited trade agreement, which would enter into force on January 1 with the de facto independence of the United Kingdom. The BBC estimates that if the domestic market law is approved by the British Parliament, the EU will take the matter to court for violating international law.

Shortly before the hastily organized Gove-Sefcovic, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress, which ranks third in America’s power rankings after the President and Vice President, stated in a resolution that Brexit should not jeopardize the Good Friday Convention, which is that of Northern Ireland and Ireland. put an end to the violence between Protestants and Irish Catholics by creating free border crossings. She added that if the UK violates international law in its current form by passing the Internal Market Act, there is no chance that a UK-US free trade agreement will go through the US Congress.

Consternation

Brandon Lewis, the British government’s secretary of state for Northern Ireland, made an absurd comment when he said when the law was introduced that they wanted to violate international law in a well-defined and limited way, according to Philip Stephens, a spokesman for the Financial Times. Perhaps he thought that Russia did the same when it annexed Crimea from Ukraine and, in a well defined way, China abolished the rule of law in Hong Kong by introducing a security law that made the police the job of handling political protests.

The publicist recalls that the independence of the British judiciary has contributed much to the United Kingdom so far in two ways: in part, it has been one of the foundations of the good international image of the country, and many have resorted to British justice because they trusted what they were willing to sacrifice. However, with the suspension of the parliamentary session last fall, Prime Minister Boris Johnson once crossed the limits of legitimacy because he wanted to prevent the legislature from having a say in the conduct of Brexit. Ultimately, the Supreme Court returned the Prime Minister and his government to the path of legality.

Former Prime Minister Theresa May has warned her successor that by violating her, the government will undermine the trust of all its foreign partners, so there will be no way to make good trade deals in the future. However, according to a publicist for the Financial Times, the message that this measure would send about British national character to the outside world is more important. With this move, Johnson is ready to stand on the rock of Dover and shout to the world: Welcome to Britain, the homeland of a nation that can no longer be trusted.



[ad_2]