[ad_1]
The management of the University of Theater and Film Arts has been characterized by a series of recurring irregularities for ten years, writes the State Audit Office in a statement. The SAO replied that Eszter Novák, former vice-rector of the SZFE, had said on the ATV that there was no “transfer” at the University of Theater and Cinema. The announcement shows that the In a statement, the State Audit draws the attention of the resigned management of the University to the preparation of the transfer, which will ensure compliance with legal regulations, in order to generate transparent accounting with public funds and assets .
The State Audit Office draws attention to the preparation and implementation of the transfer of the University of Theater and Cinematographic Arts (SZFE), which ensures compliance with legal regulations, in order to create transparent accounting with public funds and assets . SZFE’s management has been characterized by a series of recurring irregularities for about 10 years. The purpose of the SAO is to protect public funds and assets, develop public finances, writes the SAO in its statement.
“Every organization that administers public funds is responsible to the public for its management of public funds. Public funds and national patrimony must be administered in accordance with the principles of transparency and purity of public life,” stipulates the Basic Law. “Higher education institutions must be exemplary, exemplary organizations. It is in the public interest that these institutions function properly, fully comply with the regulations that govern their management, properly use the public funds entrusted to them, and be an example for the students they teach, ”adds the SAO:
In 2014-2015, the State Audit Office audited the performance of all higher education institutions maintained by the state in 2009-2013. conducted an audit of the period between.That was when it turned out that the design and operation of the internal control system of the University of Theater and Film Arts, which provides protection against threats of corruption and irregularities, did not comply with legal requirements. The SAO also disclosed a number of deficiencies and irregularities in SZFE’s financial and asset management.
The SAO made 11 proposals to the Rector of the SZFE, which consist of several subsections, from which the University’s management drew up an action plan consisting of 38 tasks. The implementation of this was evaluated by the SAO in February 2018, during which it established that the University management completed only 4 of the 38 tasks undertaken in its action plan on time. The management system developed at SZFE did not yet support the regular, transparent and responsible use of public funds.
The public finance risks identified and the irresponsible management behavior justified the initiation of another audit of the SAO, which ended in May 2019. It turned out that SZFE’s internal control system did not ensure the conditions for transparent, regular and responsible management of public funds. There is still no integrity control system to protect against corruption. Protection of state property was not ensured, nor was its disclosure transparent.
The SAO also drew attention to the fact that since the University’s management has not complied with legal requirements for years, it may be justified to consider performing the public tasks of the SZFE within other organizational frameworks to ensure proper use. of public funds and the protection of public property.
[ad_2]
