In July, 0% of people in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada tested for the tested Weed-1 for, which has barely any traces of the virus and could be, as today’s tests are very sensitive.
Health experts say the PCR test – the most commonly used diagnostic test for COVID-19 in the US – is highly sensitive and needs to be adjusted to rule out people with negligible amounts of the virus in their systems because they are not potentially contagious.
Today’s PCR test, which provides a yes or no answer if a patient is infected, does not say how much virus is in the patient’s body.
PCR tests analyze the genetic material from a virus in a cycle, and today’s tests usually take an or 37K0 cycle, but experts say this is too high because it detects very small amounts of the virus that do not pose a risk.
Doctors say lower thresholds of the cycle, i.e. the number of cycles needed to detect the virus, pose risks that increase the amount of the virus, according to the New York Times.
Coronavirus mortality rates may be lower than high infection rates, as standard tests diagnose a large number of people who can carry the virus ‘relatively little’, experts say.
Today the U.S. There are 5.9 million cases of Covid-19 and 182,000 people have died there.
U.S. on Thursday. In 45,604 cases of new coronavirus have been reported. If contagious rates in Massachusetts and New York are applied nationwide, it could mean that as many as 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and participate in contact tracing.
As of Sunday, the U.S. daily positive rate was 8.66 percent, according to Johns Hopkins. The World Health Organization says countries that have undergone extensive testing for COVID-19 should stay at 5 percent or less for at least 14 days before reopening.
The researchers say the solution is a more widespread use of rapid tests with an adjusted threshold to gain access to highly infected people with COVID-19.
This suggestion runs counter to the White House Coronavirus Task Force’s recently updated testing guidelines.
Last Monday the CDC changed its guidelines, which now say that if you had a disclosure but no symptoms, ‘you don’t need a test unless you’re a sensitive person’ or a doctor’s advice.
Earlier, the agency recommended testing after close contact with someone who had a Covid-19 infection.
On Thursday, the Trump administration announced it would buy 150 million faster tests, but doctors say the testing process needs to change.
‘The decision not to test asymptomatic people is really backward. In fact, we should all test different people, but we have to do it by completely different methods, ‘said Harvard T.H. Chan School Public Health Epidemiologist Dr. Michael Meena told the Times.
‘We use some kind of data for everything, and that’s just a plus or minus – just. “We are using it for clinical diagnostics, for public health, for policy decision making,” Meena said.
Meena added, ‘This is really irresponsible, I think let alone believe that this is a quantitative issue,’ Meena added.
On Thursday, the Trump administration announced it would buy 150 million faster tests, but Meena says the testing process needs to change.
The solution to today’s test is to now adjust the cycle threshold used to determine if a patient is infected in small numbers.
Most tests set a limit of 40 or 37, which means you are positive for COVID-19 if the test requires 40 or 37 cycles to detect.
“The door to testing is so high that it detects people with live viruses and those with a few genetic fragments that are immune and will not pose a risk,” says Meena. It’s like finding hair in a room after someone leaves her.
Today the U.S. There are 5.9 million cases of Covid-19 and 182,000 people have died there
According to Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside, experts say a reasonable cutoff for the virus would be 30 or 35 cycles.
Meena said she would set a cutoff of 30.
New York State Lab Wadsworth analyzed cycle thresholds already gives values in processed COVID-19 PCR tests and found in July that 4,440 positive tests were based on 40 cycle thresholds.
With a cut-off of 35, half of those tests will no longer qualify as positive. About 70 percent would not be considered positive if the cycle was limited to 30.
In Massachusetts, 85 to 90 percent of people who tested positive with a cycle threshold of 40 in July would be considered negative if the threshold was 30 cycles.
“I would say there should be contact, not just one of those people,” he said.
The Food and Drug Administration said the cycle used to determine who is positive does not specify the threshold range and “commercial manufacturers and laboratories have set their own.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said it was investigating the use of cycle threshold measures for ‘policy decision making’.
The CDC said its own calculations indicate it is extremely difficult to detect live viruses in a sample above the 33-cycle threshold.
Healthcare workers examine patients at the city-run COVID-19 test site in New York on July 21
“It’s just a kind of brainwashing for me that people don’t take note of CT values from all these tests – that they just came back positive or negative,” said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University in New York.
He added, ‘It would be useful information to know if someone has a positivity, whether it is a high viral load or a low viral load.’
The FDA notes that people may have a lower viral load when a new infection arrives, and a low-sensitivity test misses the infection.
Meena says that if this is the case then those people can be re-tested.
People infected with COVID-19 are most likely to become infected within a day or two before symptoms appear.
Virology experts say tests are now needed that test everyone who is fast, cheap and abundant enough for their needs – even if it means the tests are less sensitive.
‘It probably won’t catch every one of the transmitters, but it will make sure to catch the most transmissible ones, including the Superstriders. That alone will lead the epidemic to practically zero, ‘Meena said.
.
