Zamalek is entering a moment of just mathematical reason for the first time in the Mortada era

“Hamdi Al-Naqaz’s complaint has been accepted,” this text that entered Zamalek under the unilateral contract cancellation clause for a just sporting reason, was the first time in the era of Mortada Mansour, the club’s president since 2014 .

The decision of the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber contradicted the statements made by the President of the Zamalek Club on more than one occasion, where he announced on more than one occasion that the Tunisian player received his fees until April, although the decision to terminate the contract occurred more than 4 months ago. .

Mortada Mansour said in video statements made on December 5, 2019: “If you are not ashamed, exploit what you want, you are a quorum, your contract with Zamalek is for 4 seasons, two seasons have passed and two seasons remain … according to his contract with the club received two lots of his dues until January 2020, he is expected to receive the new lot next April “.

However, the FIFA decision, which was issued in favor of Hamdi Al-Naqaz, although not yet final, but places the club in front of the spectrum of previous crises, which witnessed the issuance of similar decisions in the club during the first half of the last decade.

Article 14 of the FIFA Player Affairs Regulations states: “Any contract may be terminated by either party without consequences of any kind (whether to pay compensation or impose sports sanctions) when there is just cause.”

Article 14, clause 1 clarifies the following: “In the event that the club does not illegally pay at least two months of salary to the player on its due date, the player will be considered to have a just reason to terminate his contract, provided to notify the debtor club in writing and give the club no less than 15 days to fully meet its financial obligations. “

According to this text, Hamdi Al-Naqaz is supposed to be at least two months behind his salary when his contract ended in December 2019, along with notification to the club 15 days before the contract is broken, causing Mortada Mansour’s statement about the player receiving his odds for 6 months after this. The story beforehand needs evidence presented to FIFA.

Zamalek suffered huge debts due to the cancellation of player return contracts for a fair sporting reason, a clause used by players like Alexis Mondmo, Razak Omotwisi, Hussein Yasser Al-Muhammadi, Karim El-Hassan and others who left the club during Nearby periods due to lack of litigation.

The biggest crisis in Hamdi Al-Naqaz’s case is that the FIFA decision, not final, awarded Hamdi Al-Naqaz the amount of $ 286,016, but approved compensation nearly 4 times greater than $ 1,019,355.