We publish the words of the “lady of the court” about her accusation of assaulting an officer



[ad_1]

Books – Tariq Samir:

“Masrawy” obtained the text of the investigations carried out by the Nozha Prosecutor’s Office on the accusation of Noha Al-Imam, a prosecutor of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office, which referred to retirement, of attacking the head of the Heliopolis Court guards.

To the text of the defendant’s statements:

Q: What do you say about what is attributed to you that you are accused of assaulting one of the officers, who is Lieutenant Colonel Walid Asal, commander of the Heliopolis Tribunal guards, by force or violence in the performance from your job, and what resulted in the injury shown in the attached report?

A: No.

Q: What do you say about what is attributed to you that you are accused of insulting one of the officers, who is Lieutenant Colonel Walid Asal, commander of the Heliopolis Tribunal guards, when he said while doing his job?

A: No.

Q: What do you say about what you are accused of publicly insulting the victim, Lieutenant Colonel Walid Asal, calling him in derogatory terms and affecting his dignity and his own affairs, as shown in the investigations?

A: No.

Q: What do you say about what you are charged with destroying the personal property (“military rank – wireless device) shown in the description of the papers?

A: No.

Q: What happened and what are the circumstances of your arrest and your offer to us?

A: What happened was that I was in court today to file a complaint, and I ran into an officer at my request to wear a mask, so I left the court for his food and came back to meet him with a problem, So I told him that I know you and you love me what? My cell phone hijacker, Justice Department butcher, Carnegie of the Sun, and Lacoste brand sunglasses, and after I met him, he detained me in court until I offered him a soldier who took 100 pounds.

Q: When and where did this happen?

A: This speech took place on August 30, at one in the afternoon in the Court of Heliopolis on the ground floor.

Q: What is the reason and occasion of your presence at the place and time mentioned above?

A: I came today to file a complaint. Because I was withdrawing money from United Bank for a while and I found the account with no money.

Q: Who was with you?

A: I was alone.

Q: What do you notice when you arrive at the mentioned place?

A: I met the officer downstairs and he asked me to wear a muzzle.

Q: What is your behavior towards that?

A: I went to the pharmacy, took a muzzle, and went back to court.

Q: Were you able to submit your complaint?

A: No, it couldn’t.

Q: What prevented it?

A: The officer found me again, even though I put on a mask and became a problem.

Q: What is your relationship with Lieutenant Colonel Walid Assal, Commander of the Heliopolis Court Guard?

A: I don’t know and I have no relationship.

Q: What was the dialogue that took place between you and the officer?

A: I met him, G was making trouble with me and yelling loudly for no reason, and I was surprised that he took my phone.

Q: What prompted you to do this?

A: I have not had any problems with myself. Why?

Q: What is your reaction to that?

A: I wanted to do something with him and was surprised that he took the phone out of my hand.

Q: How does this do the above?

A: I found him quickly taking the phone out of my hand and grabbing the Ministry of Justice card, the solar club card, and the sunglasses.

Q: What is your reaction to that?

A: I screamed with him. Because he took my phone and you had nothing to do with him.

Q: Did you assault the officer?

A: No, I was surprised by what happened.

Q: What action did Lieutenant Colonel Walid Asal take against you?

A: The officer landed in Kalbash’s hands and took me into custody.

Q: Why did you do this?

A: I don’t know.

Q: Did you reveal to the aforementioned that you are a member of a judicial body?

A: Yes, I said while taking the meat.

Q: What do you say about what was verified by Lieutenant Colonel Walid Assal and testified by the investigations of the Prosecutor’s Office that when he was in court he photographed the employees of the Prosecutor’s Office with his phone, and as soon as he was notified, he attacked him with insults, and as soon as his phone was seized, he attacked him and took away his military rank and caused the injury? Cabling?

A: It wasn’t me who attacked me for taking my phone and creating a problem while trying to grab my phone.

Q: What do you say about what Muhammad Hassan Abdullah and Hiba Rajab Abdul Aziz testified in the prosecution investigations that when they were at the scene of the incident it was clear to them that you violated the above by insulting, spitting, taking away your military rank, causing your injury and damage a wireless device?

A: No.

Q: Who has updated the jacket and device damage fixed?

A: It is very clear that the range is dislocated.

Q: What is your comment on what Lieutenant Colonel Walid Assal testified in the prosecution’s investigations into his destruction of personal property that were previously presented to him (officer rank – wireless device)?

A: Cut and it’s all done from scratch. Because I complained because before I had a registration against the union of owners of my building.

Q: What is your connection to the previous score that you were offered (mobile phone)?

A: This is my phone.

Q: What is your reasoning for the existence of several photographs on the private phone showing some of the doubters in court, as well as some employees of the Nuzha Prosecutor’s Office?

A: I was trying to photograph the officer as he attacked me and yelled at me, even though I told him that I am an advisor.

Q: Are there witnesses to that incident?

A: Many people have seen it.

Q: What do you notice about what was shown to you (a video of the incident)?

A: I was in line with the officer; Because he took my phone and I was trying to answer.

Q: What prompted you to do this?

A: Because he took my phone away and deliberately fabricated an argument like the one I made.

Q: Who filmed these clips?

A: I don’t know who.

The Supreme Council of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office, headed by Counselor Essam Al-Minshawi, had ordered the referral of Noha Al-Imam Al-Sayed, Prosecutor of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office, who was communicating in the media with the “lady of the court “, to the pension.

Prosecutor Hamada Al-Sawy, counselor, ordered the referral of the “General Prosecutor of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office” to criminal proceedings. For accusing her of insulting a police officer with gestures and saying in the performance of her work, and of raping him by force and violence, and her transgression occurred, which caused injuries, as well as the deliberate destruction of personal property that she does not have, with economic damage.

[ad_2]