[ad_1]
Producer Nasr Mahrous confirmed that he refuses to mention the term monopoly contract in the contract between himself and artist Bahaa Sultan.
Producer Nasr Mahrous also confirmed that Baha Sultan is the one who caused the disruption for himself and himself, emphasizing that if things went the right way, the situation would change to what it is now.
Nasr Mahrous said in a telephone interview with journalist Wael Al-Ibrashi on “The Ninth” program, which airs on Egypt’s Channel One, explaining that each song sung by Bahaa Sultan broke the world and entered the heart of the people, and the number of songs that were made should have been higher, and the material and artistic level was different. What is there.
He emphasized his refusal to describe the status quo as a disruption of Baha Sultan’s talent by having a monopoly, and objected to calling it a monopoly offer in the first place.
Saying that the contract he signs with the artist is an agreement to produce, distribute, sell and circulate musical artistic content and not a monopoly, he then added that the commitment to contracts is not called a monopoly.
At the end of his speech, he asked, for example, if it was possible that Mohamed Salah played for a club other than Liverpool out of courtesy.
Bahaa Sultan announces the termination of his contract with Free Music, owned by producer Nasr Mahrous, and the latter’s refusal to the matter, but Sultan still confirms that the ruling is in his favor.
The dispute between Sultan and Mahrous began in 2014 with the sale of the album “Sijara”, which was not released due to Mahrous’s refusal to put the album on the market after Bahaa refused to renew it with him. With a million and a half dollars, Bahaa Sultan decided to respond by filing a lawsuit against Mahrous, and the crisis remained between the two.