“They burned his genitals and violated his honor.” A woman was imprisoned for 3 years for torturing her husband’s son

The Fayoum Criminal Court, headed by Counselor Talaat Muhammad Qandil (Head of Court) and members of Counselor Yen Sadiq Muhammad Al-Haddad, Hani Ramsis Kamel at the Beni Suef Court of Appeal, and the Secretary of the Registrar of Muhammad Abdul Basir Qarni, sentenced a stepmother to 3 years in prison and tortures her husband’s son for the shame of her husband. 9 years.

The facts of the case, according to the records, date back to 2019, when the defendant, “Shadia SSA”, defamed the offer of the victim to the minor, “Mazen AS Ali”, for his refusal, by detaining him while he was with her, for being his father’s wife in the same house in one of his rooms. She tied him up and handcuffed him with his hands and feet and grabbed a knife (stick – hose – metal spoon). Forensic Medicine, which caused his health to deteriorate, due to her dislike for him and her preference for her children over him.

The following are the parts of the basic text:

“The facts of this case are being concluded according to the certainty of the court and his conscience reassured and conscientiously satisfied him. It is extracted from the documentation of the case, the investigations that were carried out and the process in this regard in the trial session, that on the date of the fact the accused “us M” Indecent assault on the victim of the child “m. P. P »reluctantly of him who stopped him while he was with her, since she was his father’s wife in the same house in one of his rooms. When torturing him, he was indifferent to his young age, tiny body and bitten, which caused the injuries mentioned in the forensic report, which caused a deterioration in his health and infection with the Coronavirus, due to the hatred he felt for him and her preference for her children over him, and thus she achieved her goal by inflicting harm on him to prevent her from playing and having fun by being one of those responsible for raising him (her father’s wife).

Considering that, it has been verified that the aforementioned fact is correct, the evidence of its occurrence and its attribution to the accused is correct, and that is why the witnesses testified and what was proven in the investigations into the interrogation of the victim of the minor , evidenced in the proof of the hospital health insurance report and the evidence of the forensic report and copy of the child’s birth.

The police officer stated that he had received a notification of the arrival of the victim to the hospital with many injuries indicating that he had been subjected to torture, so he went to the hospital where he was being treated, and when asked, decided that the accused (the wife of his father) was the one who beat and tortured him causing his injuries in different parts of his body, including the place of his chastity of his penis and the orphan, using his hands and two bladed weapons (stick – hose), as well as tools hot as a spoon and his bite of his thigh, and that if he was detained in one of the rooms and tied by the hands and conducting his secret investigations, he would achieve his health in the same way as expressed in the statements of the victim, with the intention to prevent it. Of fun, play and moderation in this sense.

A doctor testified that he was immediately working at his job. He received the case of the victim, who was almost unconscious and with wounds all over his body with many abrasions, scrapes, contusions, wounds and burns. He gave him the necessary medical attention, and to the extent that he asked him about the cause of these injuries, he decided that the accused was the one who beat him. In the same way, do not deviate from the content of the first witness’s statements, causing your injuries.

An investigator from the Children’s Helpline stated that she had received a notification from the Children’s Helpline that the victim had arrived at the hospital where he was being treated, suffering physical torture.

The forensic doctor stated that, according to the order of the Public Ministry to sign the medical examination of the child victim, it was clear to him that his injuries were old, in the healing stage, and recent on the scalp that were produced by traumatic tools such as the stick, abrasions and scrapes to the face and forehead from slapping the hands, as well as the general effects of pressure on the nose and mouth. The chest, abdomen, back and four limbs were caused by traumatic tools such as the stick and the hose, traces of human bite on the right thigh, first and second degree burns on the back, thighs, buttocks, penis, back of the hands, feet and fingers resulting from contact with solid metal objects such as a spoon.

And it has been proven in the investigations that the girl victim was asked in the first place that she decided that the incident occurred and that the accused committed it in the same way that he did not deviate from the content of the first witness’s statements, informing him of his injury in the same way that she does not deviate from the content of the statements of the second and third witnesses, and that in doing so she kept her mouth with her hands to prevent it. From Mayday

And it was proved from the attached medical reports of the Fayoum Health Insurance Hospital on the injured child victim in the same way that it does not deviate from the content of the second witness’s statements.

It has been established from the forensic report that the injuries of the victim, how and when they occurred, are in the same way that they do not deviate from the content of the statements of the fourth witness.

From the reality of the victim’s birth certificate, it was established that he was not more than nine years old from the moment of the event.

When the accused was asked in the investigations, she denied what she was accused of, and in the trial session, the accused went in person and held a denial sit-in, with a lawyer explaining the circumstances and circumstances of the case and requesting the acquittal based on the defense of the absence of the material and moral element in the crime of indecent assault and the crime of detention and the absence of the material element in the absence of knives and the crime. There are no controls, no tools were seized, no serious investigations, no papers, no inspection of the scene of the incident and no investigations.

While, for the defense of the absence of the crime before the accused, it is then attributed to what is established by the circumstances and circumstances of the case and the statements of the defendant’s test witnesses detaining the victim, chaining his clothes, discovering his nudity and attacking him by burning his body in the genitals and attacking him by hitting him with a knife with a stick and rope. A hot metal spoon and a hose, inflicting his injuries and what was proven by the questioning of the minor victim as evidence that she assaulted him in the previous way and bit him on the thigh, which is consistent with the injuries described in the forensic report and the hospital reports and supported the investigations of the investigations, which was confirmed by the court’s certainty that the intention to stop and harm the beating AND torture and indecent assault and the availability of criminal intent to the accused from the direction of his will to his arrest, torture and indecent assault according to the previous method of his hatred towards him and his preference for his children over him, and abruptly from this his purpose by preventing him from having fun and playing and repressing him.