Surprises in the statement of the Prosecutor’s Office about the “baby Tookh” who died of hunger … Know them

The Public Ministry ordered a married couple four days in preventive detention pending investigation, accusing them of intentionally killing their three-month-old young son by leaving him without care until his death, thus endangering his life and therefore endangering his life, and the district judge decided to continue detaining them for another 15 days.

The “Public Ministry” had received a notification from the boy’s father – at the Toukh Center in Qalyubia – that he had discovered the death of his son after his return from work to his residence, so the “Public Ministry” went to examine the child’s body and found it in a state of decomposition. Legal »to perform the autopsy, an explanation of the cause of death and the extent of the criminal suspicion.

Later, the “Public Ministry” went to the residence of the minor’s parents – the place of his death – and examined the room in which his body was found, and the effects of decomposition by throwing him on the bed in which was placed, and no signs of violence were found in the home.

The “Public Ministry” learned from the discussion of the baby’s parents who left him alone because of a dispute between them, so they left the conjugal home without caring for the child. She arrested them and questioned them about what was attributed to them, and they denied it, and the accused decided that his wife left their house without the infant accompanied by a three-year-old brother following what happened between them, and then left the hurriedly home to continue his work leaving the victim alone with the assumption that his mother would return with him Without informing her or any of her relatives who reside on the same property about it, and he remained nine days at his workplace without being satisfied with the victim’s condition, until he called his wife during his return to his home. home on October 26 to find out about her and the baby, so he learned from her that she left him for him to care for, so he returned home and found out. His death, and explained that during their disputes they used to leave their two children without care, and that the defendants previously had left the baby alone.

While the defendant decided that her husband forcibly took the infant from her when she left the house due to their disagreement, and that she was not satisfied with his condition during the nine days until his death except through a neighbor who told him She asked to send her daughter to inquire about the infant, confirming that she and her husband always had a disagreement, and that therefore she used to leave a residence. Marriage, their infant two children and their brother voluntarily, sometimes or by force, at other times.

And because the defendant recognized that her phone had automatically recorded the conversations that were taking place through it, the Prosecutor’s Office listened after examining a conversation between her and her husband in which he told her that he was heading back home , and he asked her about the baby and she replied that she left him to take care of him and did not know anything about him. The baby.

The “Public Ministry” asked the relatives of the accused, and they all confirmed their habit of leaving their home and their two children in it due to the differences between them. The defendant’s family confirmed that she tried to monitor the infant during the last nine days in which she left him through the daughter of a neighbor. – Fourteen years old – who denied the accusation of the accused and her family and was not asked to check the baby.

The Public Ministry notified the incident to the “Child Care Line of the National Council for Childhood and Maternity” to study and evaluate the marital status of the deceased infant’s brother. The specialist in charge of the study recommended his delivery to his mother’s family, and the Public Ministry decided that the investigations are being completed.