Nasser Abbas: The “VAR” extinguishes the brightness of the ruler Mahmoud Naji in the meeting between Al-Hodoud and Zamalek



[ad_1]

Border Guard * Zamalek

Competition: Round 33 of the General League Championship

The stadium: Haras Al Hodoud stadium

The result of the match: two goals against one goal for Zamalek

Referee: Mahmoud Naji

First Assistant: Rajab Muhammad

The second assistant: Ahmed Attia

Fourth official: Mahmoud Rushdie

VAR referees: Wael Farhan, Ibrahim Mahjoub

Evaluation scale for the team of judges:

Referee: Mahmoud Naji

Technical decisions and match control: In a difficult match in which the referee exerted a lot of effort and concentration and his decisions were some correct, and some wrong as a result of not distinguishing between negligence, recklessness and fair play violations and as a result the referee rejected VAR cooperation in one of the important cases within the region. The punishment and the most important events were the following:

The first case: In the 5th minute of the first half, a decision by the referee to count a correct penalty kick in favor of Al-Hodoud as a result of the violation of touching the ball by hand by the defender of Zamalek Al-Winch, and the referee is close and has a good angle of vision and does not hesitate to count the violation and the VAR confirms the correctness of the referee’s decision.

The second case: In the 43rd minute, the referee counts an infraction in favor of the player of Hodd Ayoub bin Participate Ali the limits of the penalty area of ​​Zamalek and an objection of the players of Zamalek. In fact, there is no infraction and the referee should have indicated the continuation of the rally.

The third case: In the 90th minute, a case of jumping over the opponent of Zamalek’s player Al-Winch against Al-Hodoud’s player Nana Antwi and a request from the border players to take a penalty. The referee indicates the continuation of the game and the game is stopped at the request of the VAR to see the case and the referee will clearly see the situation and return the decision not to count the offense of the penalty. The clear in favor of the border and rejects the model of cooperation with the VAR, which was the decision to summon the referee is correct.

The element of fitness and positioning: good physical condition and good use of the element of general resistance, endurance, speed and maximum speed in addition to continuing to play within the penalty areas.

Sanctions and disciplinary cards: The referee warned Grindo in the 46th minute of the result to play recklessly, and in the 18th and 39th minutes of the first half, both Mohamed Tahha, Hodd’s player, and Mostafa Mohamed had to be declared a yellow card, Zamalek, for playing recklessly and thwarting the promising attack.

Evaluation of the two assistant referees:

The first assistant: Indicated offside cases in minute 4 with the correct estimate.

The second assistant: Ali referred to the offside cases in the 20th minute with the correct estimate, and indicated the continuation of the game on Zamalek’s second goal with the correct estimate.

Fourth referee: cooperate with the refereeing team in accordance with the law.

VAR referees: correct intervention by the VAR in the 90th minute and summons the referee to monitor in case of a penalty not awarded to the border guards.

[ad_2]