[ad_1]
Ali Abu Grisha and Imad Suleiman, former stars of the Ismaili club and the Egyptian national team, were eager to visit the Al-Ahly club today, Monday, as the duo met with Sayed Abdel Hafeez, the football director of the red team . after a series of telephone consultations that brought Abu Greisha together with Mahmoud Al-Khatib, president of the Al-Ahly club, in order to borrow some of the stars of the red giant similar to the visit that the Ismaili delegation made yesterday to the Zamalek club .
A delegation from Ismaili visits Al-Ahly (1)
A delegation from Ismaili visits Al-Ahly (2)
The dervish had received a break from training yesterday Sunday, after a positive draw with Ghazl El Mahalla with two goals for each team on the ninth day of the competition, and all the goals came from penalties, and Ismaili’s balance rose to 7 points from 8 games in thirteenth place.
This is the first time that 4 penalty shots have been counted in a match since the confrontation with the border guards and Ismaili last season, which took place last August, 212 days ago to be exact, during which Ibrahim Noureddine counted the match referee 4 penalty kicks. , 3 for the Guards and one for the Ismaili.
Ismaili issued a written objection at the arbitration level, which came as follows: “Ismaili fully trusts the Egyptian arbitration and appreciates all the efforts made to improve the arbitration system and the use of the mouse … But with full recognition That Ismaili did not invoke refereeing, but the effort of the players and the team was wasted on decisions. A mistake made him lose many points ”.
Ismaili’s statement added: “It is inconceivable that everyone reported the accuracy of Ismaili’s goal in the National Bank match, but the issuance of the party’s ruling hissed and hatred on its way to the target prevented the interference of the fugitive and everyone. They acknowledged this mistake and reported the validity of Ismaili’s goal, however, this decision is assigned to the fugitive in the turning match. Mahalla. “
He continued: “Where two penalties were counted against Ismaili, the first came from the feet of the defender to his hand without moving it, and the second was counted as a penalty for the defender Ismaili who played the ball and without any friction with the attacker from Ghazl al-Mahalla and the failure of the match was close to the game and did not count it, but the failure of the mouse returned and counted it.
The statement concluded: “For this reason, Ismaili leads to consider that these errors deprived the team of the points it deserved.
The club does not question anyone about the refereeing system, but wants the referee committee to review all the errors that occurred against the Ismaili and work not to repeat them, and we are fully aware that the errors of the refereeing and the fugitive are being sought. , but repeating them more than once with Ismaili deprived him of the points they deserve.