“He insulted me and repeated an insulting phrase to the Judiciary and the Prosecutor’s Office.” What did the official say about the “lady of the court”?

Al-Masry Al-Youm obtained the text of the investigations carried out by the Nuzha Prosecutor’s Office on the accusation of the counselor Noha Al-Imam, prosecutor of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office, known in the media as the “Lady of the Court”, from assault the head of the guards of the Court of Heliopolis.

The sayings of the chief of the guards of the Court of Heliopolis

Q: Your name and your age?

A: Walid Asal Muhammed, 40, is a police lieutenant colonel and commander of the Heliopolis court guard.

Q: What is the nature of your job and your employment jurisdiction?

A: I am a Police Officer with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, serving as the Chief Guardsman for the Heliopolis Court Complex, specializing in handling transfers and court security. In addition to the decision of the Prime Minister, in addition to finding violators of any of these procedures.

Q: How long have you been studying this specialization?

A: About two years ago.

Q: What is your information on this incident under investigation?

A: What happened was that while doing my day job, and as soon as I reviewed the security situation, I noticed that one of the women entered the courtroom without wearing a medical mask, so I alerted her to the need for wear the muzzle and repeat the phrase “Oh thief, oh ..” and I went out, brought a medical mask and went to the prosecution. Al-Nuzhah and as soon as I passed by, it was clear to me that she removed her muzzle and noticed that she had photographed the employees’ offices within the offices with the secretary of the Chief of the Nuzha Prosecutor’s Office using a mobile phone that she owned. The office of the director of the Nuzha Prosecutor’s Office, and I located her and I repeated the need to wear the muzzle and not the photograph inside the court, then she refused and repeated insults, for which she requested an investigation of her identity, but she refused, and kept abusing and insulting, so I kept her phone to have the military rank removed from my left shoulder, which led to I broke her, so I asked her to get out of court, and she repeated my phone, my thief , garbage, I am a consultant at the United Nations, so I asked her again to verify the identity, so she refused and tried to flee the court, and as soon as I stopped her and stood before him. So I removed the muzzle she was wearing, and I hurt my nose, and she also removed the radio, causing her damage as a result of breaking her antenna and scratching her right wrist on the inside if I resisted, so I took control and placed the iron shackle on her hand and stored it in the women’s detention room inside. Court, then I reported to my leadership, and the head of the Al-Nuzha police station came, and I filed a report on the incident.

Q: When and where did this happen?

A: On Sunday, August 30, 2020, at 11:30 in the morning, in the Court of Heliópolis.

The Prosecutor, Counselor, Hamada Al-Sawy, had ordered the referral of the defendant Noha Al-Imam – Prosecutor General of the Administrative Prosecutor’s Office – to criminal trial. For accusing her of insulting a police officer by pointing and saying in the performance of her work and for his performance, and raping him by force and violence during and for that, and her transgression occurred with blows that caused injuries, in addition to Deliberately destroying personal property that she does not own, resulting in financial damage.

Investigations by the Public Ministry culminated in the defendant’s attack on the “Commander of the Guard of the Heliopolis Court Complex” by saying that if he inspected the security situation in the court, after having instructed him to use a medical mask in accordance with precautionary measures, and stopped photographing some of the court employees in the performance of their duties, which constitutes an act sanctioned by law.Then when they detained her on her mobile phone to stop filming, she raped him, destroyed his military rank and a wireless device in his possession, and caused him injuries, so he kept it and wrote a note of the incident with which he attached a photo of himself, which was circulated on social networks.

The Public Ministry had consulted a lawyer and a worker who were present in court at the time of the events, who testified on the content of the victim’s testimony, and confirmed the defendant’s transgression by telling him and hitting him in addition to what that destroyed movable property, while the defendant affirmed in his interrogation that he was defending himself after the officer had made an altercation with her.

The Public Ministry examined the defendant’s phone and found six photographs taken from inside the court, in which some hesitant and employees appeared, which were captured on the day of the incident.

Consequently, the Public Ministry decided that the evidence was sufficient to take the accused to criminal trial for the crimes she had committed.