Al-Ghandour Arbitrarily Raises Controversy Over Al-Ahly-Tigris Meeting Management



[ad_1]

The match: Al-Ahly X and Wadi Degla, the fifth round of the Premier League in its 62nd edition

The result: the two teams drew without goals

The Stadium – Al Salam Stadium

International Referee – Ahmed Al-Ghandour

First Assistant – Muhammad Abdul Majeed

The Second Assistant – Shehab Rashid

Fourth official – Mohamed Hassan

The duo “VAR” – Hussam Azab – Hamada Al-Qalawi

Fitness – (Endurance – Speed ​​- Recoil – Positioning – Agility – Flexibility – Viewing Angle)

Although the referee made a great physical effort, he was moving randomly, especially in the first game, and the proper viewing angle was absent for most of the game, making it difficult for him to get out of the playing perimeter and out of the ball’s path. especially in apostates near the penalty area. It even interfered with the game at times, which made it unfortunate.

In some technical and administrative estimates, Al-Ghandour Al-Saghir was far from his usual level at which he appeared last season, and was unsuccessful in estimating time rather than

He was lost at the end of the second half of the match, and was satisfied with only 4 minutes.

Personal

Al-Ghandour was not decisive with the objections of the players, at the time he intervened well with the objections of the technical agencies, and was long delayed in publishing the cards, according to the law, in an attempt to control the match at the expense of the forces of order.

Law enforcement (28 violations – 2 warnings – 4 others ignored)

International Ahmed Al-Ghandour was in appointment to assess the technical infractions of the two teams, so he intervened with a whistle and counted 32 infractions, while allowing the continuation of the game in more than one effective infraction that required a whistle intervention, for lack of a proper viewing angle, and the yellow card was popular twice. The first was for Ahmed Magdy, the Tigris player, and the other for the red player Aliu Diang, while on more than one occasion he ignored the announcement of the card according to the law.

Assistants

The two appeared attentive, and tried to position themselves well, and allowed the continuation of the game in more than one impressive attack, and pointed out 6 offside cases in adequate time, and intervened.

They did well on mistakes close to them, and we cooperated with the referee in managing the match in accordance with the law.

Fourth official

He tried to control the technical area taking advantage of his experience in handling the devices, performed his tasks well and cooperated with the referee in managing the match in accordance with the law.

Match stats: 30 fouls – 3 corners – 2 offside – 2 cautions.

Grades: Referee 8.0 – first assistant 8.3 – second assistant 8.3 – fourth official 8.0.

Dual Video 8.0, there was no need for intervention in the booth during the event.

[ad_2]