After the acquittal and the move by the Public Ministry … this is the legal path of the case “Our Lady of Generosity”.

Several lawyers revealed the legal path of the case “Our Lady of Generosity”, after the sentence of innocence of the accused.

Yasser Sayed Ahmed, cassation lawyer, said that the Public Ministry will appeal to the cassation for being the loser of the case, and once the appeal is accepted, the acquittal will be annulled, and the “cassation” will attend the trial of the accused as a first court instance, and then its ruling will be final and irrevocable again before any criminal circuit.

“Ahmed” added to “Al-Masry Al-Youm” that the decision of the Attorney General to study the sentence to clarify the reasons for the appeal is “evident”, considering that the prosecution lost the case, and it is presumed that the reasons of the acquittal issued for “serious crimes” are deposited within 30 days from the date of delivery of the sentence, while it is challenged. Within 60 days.

Meanwhile, Ayman Mahfouz, the lawyer, said that civil plaintiffs or victims have the right to appeal the sentence before “cassation”, and that the Prosecutor’s Office can also appeal.

Mahfouz added: “We must wait until the merits of the acquittal are issued, which can be challenged within 60 days from the date of the sentence. If this time has elapsed and the sentence has not been appealed, the sentence becomes final and there is no place to appeal. “

He explained that the “cassation” does not discuss the facts that constitute the crime, while it considers whether the verdict is true and valid in law or not.

For his part, counselor Ihab Ramzi, lawyer for Mrs. Suad Thabet, known as “Our Lady of Generosity”, said that the consideration of his client’s case began with the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Abu Qurqas, Minya, since the prosecutor’s office listened to all parties in the case and listened to witnesses, and requested investigations from the investigations and National Security. And that these investigations confirmed the statements of this lady that she was completely stripped of her clothes.

He continued by saying: The Prosecutor’s Office issued a decision to preserve the papers after questioning the evidence based on this fact, indicating that it filed a complaint with the Criminal Court, which annulled the preservation decision and ordered that the defendants be referred to criminal trial, and confirmed that the evidence is sufficient for this.

He noted that after the trial phase began, and the case began to be discussed in more than one court and was referred to more than one circuit, and more than one judge apologized for it after feeling embarrassed, and in the end it was issued a prison sentence in absentia for 10 years, and the court ordered the arrest of the accused, and that is from the same circuit that issued. Rule of innocence.

He went on to say that the defendants appealed the ruling, a session was set for them and the court heard the allegation and reserved the case for trial, then the verdict was issued acquitting all defendants.

He pointed out that the court has not yet deposited the reasons for the verdict, noting that the rapid maneuver of the Public Ministry to study the aspects of the appeal against the verdict has lit and calmed souls after the frustration that afflicted society.

Meanwhile, said Ismail Sayed, the defense of the defendants of search and seizure of “Souad Thabet” that the criminal court issued a ruling acquitting the defendants of stripping the plaintiff, and the court plans to lay out the reasons for your judgment within one month from the issuance date of the judgment.

Ismail added: “The crimes ruled the innocence of the accused due to the contradiction in the statements of a woman during the five sessions, while listening to the statements of the woman, one of which was before the investigations and the fourth before the Public Ministry” .

And the lawyer continued that one of the reasons for the acquittal of the defendants is the accusation of the woman to a person who was not present at the scene.

Counselor Hamada Al-Sawy, Attorney General, ordered the technical office of his office to study the challenges to the sentence of innocence of the defendants in the case known as the “Lady of Generosity”, as soon as the criminal court that issued the sentence will deposit its reasons.

The Minya Criminal Court issued a verdict that acquitted 3 defendants involved in the assault on Ms. Suad Thabet, 70, known in the media as “Our Lady of Generosity”, in Abu Qurqas, after a fight between the villagers in 2016.

The incident dates back to May 2016, after a fight and violence occurred due to a “rumor of love”, and the existence of a relationship between a young man and a housewife, and the village witnessed clashes between the two groups, which resulted in the burning of some 7 houses and the injury of two people, supposedly due to an emotional relationship between “Ashraf”. A », 30 years old, housewife shop owner and housewife named“ NR, 32 years old.

Investigative investigations revealed at the time that the woman’s husband discovered a relationship between her and the store owner. He divorced her and several members of the woman’s family gathered in front of the young man’s house to take revenge on him, beat him and set fire to his house, which extended to 6 other nearby houses and a plastic store.

“Attia.” A », 58, a farmer, and his son Ayad, 30, is a worker, with bruises and injuries.
After that, an old woman named Souad Thabet, 70, went to the Abu Qurqas police station in southern Minya and wrote a report in which she accused several people of beating her and stripping her of her clothes.

The three defendants were referred to trial, and on January 11 a verdict was rendered in absentia, with 10 years in prison, and they repeated the proceedings of the trial, until yesterday, Thursday, a verdict of their innocence was rendered.