After his son is arrested again … the Ministry of Justice summons the father of the child Maadi to the judge

The investigating authorities of the Ministry of Justice decided, for the second time, to summon the judge, the father of the minor, owner of the two acts of verbal abuse and intimidation against individual traffic policemen, for the second time after the arrest of the minor and 4 of your friends this morning.

The Public Ministry decided to hand over the boy to his family and decided to fine the owner of the car for the scene of the incident with 10 thousand pounds, after which the boy appeared in a video broadcast on social networks, insulting and defaming several of his followers, saying: “We are prisoners, we are prisoners.”

For its part, a security source said that the arrest of the minor occurred again as a result of the appearance of a new video that shows the minor and the rest of the defendants intimidating another police officer other than the previous one, explaining that the prosecution is currently is investigating the new incident.

It should be noted that the Public Ministry yesterday announced the details of the questioning of the minor in the incident of his assault on a traffic policeman in Zahra Al-Maadi and the owner of the car in which he was traveling, which angered public opinion, announcing that He decided to hand over the boy to his family and release the owner of the car with a financial guarantee of 10,000 Egyptian pounds. Research.

The Prosecutor’s Office stated in its statement that it assigned a social worker from the Child Rescue Line of the National Council for Children and Maternity to study the social and psychological case of the accused child and prepare a report on the matter, and deposited a report in the who found that the child was severely spoiled by his father, which motivated him to commit such behavior, recommending that he hand it over to his family and commit to correct it. His behavior, and he held regular sessions for it.

It indicated that it decided in light of the provisions of Article 119 of the Children’s Law, which required preventive detention for a child who does not exceed fifteen years of age, and in light of the recommendations of the social worker to hand over the child imputed to his guardian, committing to preserve and care for him and submit him to rehabilitation and amendment sessions. Behavior: As recommended by the child helpline report.

Noting that he decided to release the owner of the car if he paid a financial bond of ten thousand pounds pending investigations, and that it is being completed by questioning who was in the company of the minor accused of the car at the time of the accident, and requesting final police investigations in this regard.

The prosecution explained that the police investigations into the circulating clip, object of the investigation, resulted in the identification of the victim, the person of the aggressor child and the owner of the car in which he was traveling by revealing the data on his metal plates.

The prosecution noted that it asked the policeman, who testified that on the afternoon of October 26, citizens who were driving a car in Barauna in the Zahraa Maadi area – his place of service – were notified to stop the car and found a boy who was driving it in the company of other people of the same age, and asked about the car and driving licenses. He was surprised when the boy and his companions had transgressed by saying and promising to hurt him, then a video conversation was held between him and the driver of the car until he went to the front of the car to write the number of his metal plates and write a violation of the incident. Then the boy, the driver and those accompanying him later approached to apologize to him, for which he accepted his apology, denying his injury from the incident.

And he continued that when questioning the driver of the car -at the age of thirteen- what was attributed to him of insulting a public official -one of the officers- by saying while and for the performance of his work, and raping him in that moment, and driving a vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license and without a driver’s license, so he decided that the car he was driving during the incident is the property of his father’s friend who bought it from the latter, and that that day and while he was at his father’s friend’s house, he stole the car keys to enter without the owner’s knowledge, then he called his friends to accompany him, and when they met the policeman he stopped him and asked him about the car and the permits driving, and he refused to take them, then turned back Between them the conversation was circulating until the policeman went to the front of the car to write down the number of their license plates, for which he left with him for fear of issuing an infraction against his owner and I know He learned at the time that the police officer had collided with the car door, and returned to him later, offering his apologies, for which he accepted it, adding that one of his friends had filmed the circulating clip. Your knowledge of someone who posted it on social media.

It added that when questioning the owner of the car – a friend of the father of the accused minor – about what was attributed to him of endangering the life of a minor and allowing him to drive a vehicle when he was under eighteen years old, and which resulted in damage to other people, denied what was attributed to him, denying his knowledge or permission for the accused to drive the vehicle. He explained that the latter came to him at noon on the day of the incident, returning from his school – as he used to do – and then was surprised that he left the house after a while, and when he examined his request from the balcony, he saw it stop your car – used in the incident – under the house. In order not to repeat his action, confirming that he bought the car from the father of the defendant in early October, when he presented the original contract to sell it to the prosecution.