[ad_1]
And she chose a channel "ITV" Description of the contract "Soldier" What happened during the interview. And she said: "The pair dispatched the B-52 bomber, ran it over Buckingham Palace and emptied their arsenal on it.".
Regarding the channel "BBC" So I considered this interview "Devastating" To reveal "Terrible pressures inside the palace" وترسم "Image of neglected people lost in an institution" They share the same indifference.
Stressed newspaper "Daily mirror" For his part in "Deep sadness" Prince Charles has Harry’s father and his older brother, William.
وندادت "Daily express" What i considered "Televised talk with opera serving special interests" To Harry and Megan, who have lived in the United States since they retired from the royal family last spring.
Like other newspapers whose pages were closed prior to the broadcast of the interview, one newspaper headlined "Daily mail" About the message "Strobe" Which was addressed by Queen Elizabeth II, Harry’s grandmother, on the sense of duty, during her televised speech on Sunday, hours before Harry and Meghan appeared in the media.
“>
“What happened was worse than any expectations the royal family had from this interview,” wrote the Times.
“Megan suffered from suicidal tendencies. She is concerned about her mental health. She cried during an official engagement. The royal family did not help her,” the newspaper added, speaking of “damaging allegations.”
The interview, broadcast on the US channel “CBS” on Sunday night, before being broadcast in Britain on Monday, showed “an image of a weak couple who felt imprisoned in their role and without protection” from the royal family. . , according to the newspaper.
As for the “Daily Telegraph”, he considered it useless for the royal family to “hide behind the sofa” and ignored the couple, saying that the family needed a “bulletproof vest” to protect themselves from the interview, which saw “enough projectiles to sink the fleet “and” maybe too “. Some fear the same damage to the British monarchy.
The newspaper added: “It is correct to say that the two-hour free interview constitutes the worst case scenario when the couple used to call it the company,” to talk about the royal family, referring in particular to the racist statements that targeted Megan. , Harry and his son Archie before he was born.
ITV chose to use a “military” characterization of what happened during the interview. “The pair sent the B-52 launcher and drove it over Buckingham Palace, and emptied their arsenal on it,” he said.
As for the BBC, this “destructive” interview was seen as revealing “the terrible pressures within the palace” and portraying “the image of neglected individuals lost in an institution” who share the same indifference.
For its part, the “Daily Mirror” newspaper highlighted the “deep sadness” of Prince Charles, Harry’s father, and his older brother William.
The “Daily Express” denounced what it considered “a televised talk with an opera serving special interests” by Harry and Megan, who have lived in the United States since they retired from the royal family last spring.
And like other newspapers whose pages were closed before the interview aired, the Daily Mail newspaper topped the “strong” message that Queen Elizabeth II, Harry’s grandmother, sent about a sense of duty, during her televised speech. on Sunday, hours before Harry and Meghan appeared in the media.
[ad_2]
